more lights, less intensity vs less lights higher intensity

Finn450

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Messages
163
Reaction score
131
Location
Fernandina Beach
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi All...looking for some feedback on lighting. 48x20x21 system. Mixed reef. Currently running Red Sea 115G2s. I have 3 lights running @ 65%. Would I be better off running 2 @ 100%? It seems the lower percentages greatly impact par readings and don't feel spread or shadowing will be an issue.
 

tbrown

Cronies #3?? Heathens' Coffee Snob???
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Messages
80,959
Reaction score
218,634
Location
Peoria, AZ
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Personally I prefer more lights to less lights. Any reason you wouldn't consider just bumping up to 70% or 75% intensity to gain PAR?
 
Last edited:

exnisstech

Grumpy old man
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
18,957
Reaction score
30,423
Location
Ashland Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
jenn-jenn-robbins (1).gif


You already have 3 lights so I would just crank them up to get the par you desire.
 

oreo54

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
6,880
Reaction score
4,087
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks all, guess I'm overthinking it and went down the path of the light being more efficient @ 100% vs 60-70%.
Technically the softer ( cooler) you run an led the more efficient it gets.

More photons/ watt but of course you have less watts

Oh and the cooler the longer they live.
In a well thermal managed light it shouldn't do much though .
638.png
 

slingfox

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Messages
2,743
Reaction score
2,610
Location
Northern California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
This is an absolute no brainer: More lights at lower intensity. Using a par meter you can dial in the lights to the correct intensity. At lower intensity the lights will run more efficiently and last longer. With more lights you get more spread and less shadowing.

The primary downside of running more lights is doing so hurts the wallet!
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 26.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 48 33.6%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 32 22.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 15 10.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.0%
Back
Top