My calcium levels high

Reeferburns

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
119
Reaction score
19
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi, I’m wondering if 490ppm and 9.6 dkh is bad or good? Do I need to try and lower my calcium? Also how do I maintain my alk level at 9.6.
 

lapin

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
11,672
Reaction score
18,286
Location
Austin
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Howdy and welcome
Your tank is fine. While on the high side nothing to worry about.
I will guess you are using a coral pro / reef crystal type salt instead of a regular reef salt
Why do you want to keep alk at 9.6?
 

xabo

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
590
Location
Wash. D.C.
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
I've found that when mixing Reef Crystals, mixing lower than 35ppt will yield lower ALK/Ca numbers.
 
OP
OP
Reeferburns

Reeferburns

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
119
Reaction score
19
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Howdy and welcome
Your tank is fine. While on the high side nothing to worry about.
I will guess you are using a coral pro / reef crystal type salt instead of a regular reef salt
Why do you want to keep alk at 9.6?
I buy all my saltwater from a store but I believe they use coral pro but I’ll have to ask next time I get water. I just felt that 9.6 would be a good number but should I keep it higher or lower? Thank you for your reply!
 

lapin

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
11,672
Reaction score
18,286
Location
Austin
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I run mine at 9.
Most regular salt mixes at about 8 to 8.5
Any where between 7.5 to 10 should be fine.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,245
Reaction score
92,258
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The values are fine.

I'd suggest reading up on the pros and cons of higher and lower alk levels. The calcium level is not very important within a pretty wide range.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 34.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.8%
Back
Top