Troylee
all about the diy!!!!!
View Badges
Ultimate Member
Reef Squad
Excellence Award
R2R App User
Moderator Emeritus
Hospitality Award
ThreadAward
My Tank Thread
My Aquarium Showcase
Looks good! Both work! I’ll see how this current grow out works out cause I’m running high on purpose and it’s going well thus far.. my corals could care less they adapt very well to anything I throw at them!Like I also said, many ways to success…however, Ime and backed by research, are that corals do better with available nutrients but at levels near ocean reefs or slightly higher.
Examples: my tank from 2000, nice and I was proud of it….however years later I realized stonies didn’t grow too fast if barely, po4 was ~>.5.
![]()
My recent tank which is smaller but very similar in terms of filters and management, however one key difference is po4 is ~ .00-.05. Stonies growth is lighting fast as compared to above. Approximately 10 months:
![]()
![]()
Finally my tank in the middle years from ~2009 to 2017 used all methods including carbon dosing, sulfur denitrification, refuge, giant powerful skimmer, daily AWC was more difficult than the other two with less success. I believe because I pushed nutrients, specifically po4, too low and corals suffered. However no algae problems including dinoflagellate. This tank, imo, is an example of a system with near ocean levels of inorganic nutrients that lacked particular nutrients that the ocean has in abundance because of over filtration.
![]()
Important note is that hobby testing could not distinguish different levels of no3 because all three examples where below hobby testing resolution with Salifert. As I have never had a reef aquarium with hobby test kit measurable no3.

