Thanks. Great reads!
Wow, those studies really make one question the value of a Macroalgae refugium. From those studies it looks like we really should be creating stony coral with sponge refugiums!
The macro algaes are just such great primary producers and exporters of nitrates and phosphates. I don't think I could maintain my current fish feeding volumes without it. I used to think the algae exudate was basically doing my carbon dosing in my DT automatically and all the heterotrophic bacteria and other microorganisms it was feeding was a good thing! All of that discussion about the bacteria in the aura-biome or holobiont shifting towards the more pathological and reef unfriendly bacteria in the presence of algae exudate really makes me question what I'm doing. I wonder if the guys at AquaBiomics have seen a significant difference in tanks which grow macro-algae refugium vs ones that don't?
Now that we have 16S DNA testing more available it will be interesting to see what it reveals as more data is collected. I'm setting up a ssytem shortly following Lee Chin Eng's methodology and will be getting AquaBiomics tests on a monthly basis. I know testing done with skimmers by Feldman at Penn state showed a skimmers skew the bacteria to non skimmable types so it will be interesting to see how this plays out in the decades to come in maintaining reef systems sustainably now that we can monitor the bacteria.
Question for you, how do you determining your current feeding regimen is appropriate for your fish and corals?

