Test Error Poll

What percentage of threads I posted to in the past month have test error as part of the discussion?


  • Total voters
    21

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,296
Reaction score
92,363
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Have a weird test result?

It is very likely test error rather than some new and wonderful chemistry.

pH 7.4? 8.8?
Magnesium jumped 50 ppm in a week?
Calcium declined 50 ppm in a day?
ORP is 13 mV?

Test error. it is way more common than you probably think. :D
 

cracker

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
16,191
Location
north east Fl
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm figuring that out pretty quick ! Usually it's the tester's (Me) fault not the kit .
 

jsker

Reefing is all about the adventure
View Badges
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
25,093
Reaction score
77,773
Location
Saint Louis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I will go with over half, I am guilty of not testing correctly.
 

lillypads reef

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Messages
79
Reaction score
82
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Randy, how can we beat this problem?

Should i just be more careful measuring when i use hobby grade kits? I use hannah or Salifert. Or do you recommend ICP test done more frequent?
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,296
Reaction score
92,363
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Randy, how can we beat this problem?

Should i just be more careful measuring when i use hobby grade kits? I use hannah or Salifert. Or do you recommend ICP test done more frequent?

One thing that most of us are guilty of (myself included) is to rush to correct a problem. If we are not sure there is a problem, or are not sure why, then the correction could actually cause a problem when none actually exists, or make it worse when the issue self corrects.

So when you get a sudden change in a value (say, calcium or salinity) that typically cannot change suddenly, take a deep breath and think about whether it makes sense. Could it even be real? Obviously if you knew you overdosed something yesterday by mistake, it is likely real. If you did not, it very likely is not.

If it is not an emergency (e.g., not high ammonia or some such critical issue), maybe don't do anything except look over the system for problems. Test again the next day to see if the "problem" changes.

Double check weird results with your own kit, then maybe a borrowed kit. I've occasionally left out steps in some multistep kits that I used a lot. Instantly gives a weird answer. Time to take a step back and think everything through. Could nitrate have dropped from 10 ppm to 0 ppm overnight? Etc. :)
 

brandon429

what, exactly, are you doing in your avatar
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
31,035
Reaction score
23,923
Location
tejas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The API .25 ammonia misread must be offered as the single most enduring and impactful test kit error in the history of our hobby. No, a cycle doesn't last seven months.

Please for an updated article someone take time to compile known lab samples of common params mixed in different ratios from miniscule to obviously high and mail them out to participants who test only numbered vials and report back

calcium
nitrate trite ammonia
Po4
Mg
All the params

Writer assembles all those against the known levels and we get an '18 update on test compliance in the hobby using the range of today's options. Include ammonia both set at real .25 and at zero and at .5 ideally.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 40 26.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 50 32.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 36 23.7%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 15 9.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 11 7.2%
Back
Top