Fair enough. I'm personally not offended but what strikes me odd is when a question is asked, then later answered, and the question is asked again by the same person, only to be answered again and no middle ground is reached it gets old. If you are not able to have a honest discussion without setting your personal bias on the table then it is time to stop. That means everyone here who is participating in the discussion including me. I'll also clarify that this product, today, isn't for me be it provided by Neptune or other. I do own the Apex ecosystem so if and when I'm ready for a product such as this then it would be the first vendor I go to because it will plug and play. Also if you need to know I go back to 2000 with the Neptune unit with X10's...go figure.
The discussions around revenue I think are unjust. I've stated that as much and as you see above with my exchange with
@JeffB418 while I do not agree I can come to a rational understanding of their opinion, respect that, and move on. I do not agree with that aspect and see it differently. In fact, if the revenue stream was a concern then they would be charging us a subscription for the fusion presentation layer. Do you think the development and hosting fees are free? If they are using AWS and any LB's in front of their app I'm pretty sure it isn't cheap... My point in this is it is a product they felt was needed. May have taken longer, may have needed a design change, may have needed other things for which non of us know. With anything else in this hobby patience is a must - why think there is an alternate motive?
I feel I'm pretty reasonable lad and can see the various themes here. I see your point and concern about testing frequency and Mg (understanding and common ground point noted above). However to say it is vapor ware over and over or the regents are nothing more than a revenue stream I think it is taking this too far. Agree to disagree but in the end if there no meeting in the middle, even after actual testers share what they can, then I call it what it is and say it is time to stop participate in the discussion.