I think the mix up is that we look at cycle as static vs continous. This cycle is on going. But tge issue is the amount of ammonia being added vs the amount of actual bioload. More ammonia is usually added in a span that would not relate to what an actual bioload does. Ontop of which plants and corals can utilise small amounts of ammonia and nitrate. As ammonia or food source runs out, the bacteria dies off to equalize to the available nutrient levels.
The other issue is there are a few good bacteria products abd a few bad products. Then we judge across the board. Some bacteria that I trust like frytz, i never had issuez and start right away adding livestock. Others may not had success or outside source causing issue and didnt know.
Live rock is the one true source of good bacteria that we can all agree on.
Im more of dont add things that can hurt down the road. Nothing wrong with adding ammonia to keep bacteria going but you dont need to add high amounts even without any other food sources.
Again, just stick with what you are doing. This way you can form your own conclusion and not have other factors to consider. You have a plan. And that is better than trailing off.
The other issue is there are a few good bacteria products abd a few bad products. Then we judge across the board. Some bacteria that I trust like frytz, i never had issuez and start right away adding livestock. Others may not had success or outside source causing issue and didnt know.
Live rock is the one true source of good bacteria that we can all agree on.
Im more of dont add things that can hurt down the road. Nothing wrong with adding ammonia to keep bacteria going but you dont need to add high amounts even without any other food sources.
Again, just stick with what you are doing. This way you can form your own conclusion and not have other factors to consider. You have a plan. And that is better than trailing off.