Do Algae Reactors Work, And Worth It?

OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here is mine
This thing grows cheato like I have never seen love it
a19ac2a3943989d0f0ccabc9e72445fe.jpg

0b60bfb92692fcd11fc121c02f90ee27.jpg

e45c7a0f5a530b21d991ec45271d82ab.jpg

Do you find the lights run hot? If you don't mind, can you post a link to them?
 

Casey McSwain

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Would running an algae reactor alongside a uv sterilizer defeat the purpose of the algae reactor???
 
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Would running an algae reactor alongside a uv sterilizer defeat the purpose of the algae reactor???

Two completely different things. The algae reactor will remove excess Nitrate & Phosphate, steady overnight Ph, hopefully out-compete micro algae.

The UV will kill any algae spores in the water column, help clear bad bacteria in the tank, raise your ORP (oxidation reduction potential), and if run at a proper flow rate can kill pathogens and parasites.

If you're using a lower end UV whose main purpose is the algae control then you may not get as many benefits, but they would still complement each other as far as oxygenation of the tank water. The reactor can remove nutrients, a UV cannot. It can only deal with free floating algae spores, which is how you keep it from spreading, while the reactor will hopefully keep it from forming in the first place.

But no, one does not negate the other. I plan to run both on my new setup as well.
 

Casey McSwain

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Two completely different things. The algae reactor will remove excess Nitrate & Phosphate, steady overnight Ph, hopefully out-compete micro algae.

The UV will kill any algae spores in the water column, help clear bad bacteria in the tank, raise your ORP (oxidation reduction potential), and if run at a proper flow rate can kill pathogens and parasites.

If you're using a lower end UV whose main purpose is the algae control then you may not get as many benefits, but they would still complement each other as far as oxygenation of the tank water. The reactor can remove nutrients, a UV cannot. It can only deal with free floating algae spores, which is how you keep it from spreading, while the reactor will hopefully keep it from forming in the first place.

But no, one does not negate the other. I plan to run both on my new setup as well.
Great info. I was misunderstanding where exactly the algae reactor process removed the nutrients. In the reactor or in the water column.
 

Casey McSwain

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Realistically, what can I expect from adding this to my system? A 5 -10 ppm decrease maybe? Combined with an anaerobic bacteria reactor, possibly a 10-15 ppm reduction?
 
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Realistically, what can I expect from adding this to my system? A 5 -10 ppm decrease maybe? Combined with an anaerobic bacteria reactor, possibly a 10-15 ppm reduction?

I would suppose it's all contextual to your setup. If you run a small reactor compared to your tank size and bioload you're going to have a lot less of a reduction in nutrients. People are also running these to out compete micro algae, steady Ph overnight, and oxygenate the water. It also can replace having to run gfo. And it does all of these things naturally, not chemically.

The diy versions are still a learning curve because it's hard finding the correct lights that won't burn out or burn the reactor.
 

roberthu526

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
1,220
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had mine setup.
Aquamaxx reactor
I have been having algae problem and I think it's due to my phosphate level being at 0.2-0.3. Running GFO doesn't seem to be very effective and it is also quite expensive.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had mine setup.
Aquamaxx reactor
I have been having algae problem and I think it's due to my phosphate level being at 0.2-0.3. Running GFO doesn't seem to be very effective and it is also quite expensive.

Did you go with the AquaMaxx kit that comes with the Accel Aquatics lights?

GFO should definitely be effective with lowering phosphates, but is overly expensive. Were you running the correct amount and at the proper flow rate? Usually when you have high phosphate and you run gfo, it will lower the phosphates but will get used up pretty fast at first. You have to replace it often in the beginning until you're at a consistently low level. But who wants to spend all that money if there's a natural way.

I was going to contact Accel Aquatics to see about a longer led strip but I can't find any info on them at all. They don't have a webpage, no contact info, no warranty support info (according to Google). I couldn't find a parent company or anything. Because people seem to have good results with their lights and I don't think they run hot. They're just very short. But it's like they're a ghost. No info on the web at all.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had mine setup.
Aquamaxx reactor
I have been having algae problem and I think it's due to my phosphate level being at 0.2-0.3. Running GFO doesn't seem to be very effective and it is also quite expensive.

GFO should be effe
Realistically, what can I expect from adding this to my system? A 5 -10 ppm decrease maybe? Combined with an anaerobic bacteria reactor, possibly a 10-15 ppm reduction?

Just out of curiosity, what type of anaerobic bacteria reactor are you running? A fluidized sand filter?
 

roberthu526

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
1,220
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you go with the AquaMaxx kit that comes with the Accel Aquatics lights?

GFO should definitely be effective with lowering phosphates, but is overly expensive. Were you running the correct amount and at the proper flow rate? Usually when you have high phosphate and you run gfo, it will lower the phosphates but will get used up pretty fast at first. You have to replace it often in the beginning until you're at a consistently low level. But who wants to spend all that money if there's a natural way.

I was going to contact Accel Aquatics to see about a longer led strip but I can't find any info on them at all. They don't have a webpage, no contact info, no warranty support info (according to Google). I couldn't find a parent company or anything. Because people seem to have good results with their lights and I don't think they run hot. They're just very short. But it's like they're a ghost. No info on the web at all.

I do think I need to replace the GFO because I stared with a small amount as suggested by many people. But it is very expensive on the long run.

I had to turn off the LED lights I bought on Amazon posted in this thread a few days ago because it got so hot that when I touched it I thought I got burnt. The AC/DC power adapter also got extremely hot and made me worry. Maybe this is a good setup when the weather is colder.

I do have the accel light from MD but it is kind short so I didn't use it. I will test it out to see how hot it gets. If it stays relative cool I will give it a shot on the smaller reactor. I have both the big and small ones. I will keep updating until I find a solution lol
 
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I do think I need to replace the GFO because I stared with a small amount as suggested by many people. But it is very expensive on the long run.

I had to turn off the LED lights I bought on Amazon posted in this thread a few days ago because it got so hot that when I touched it I thought I got burnt. The AC/DC power adapter also got extremely hot and made me worry. Maybe this is a good setup when the weather is colder.

I do have the accel light from MD but it is kind short so I didn't use it. I will test it out to see how hot it gets. If it stays relative cool I will give it a shot on the smaller reactor. I have both the big and small ones. I will keep updating until I find a solution lol

No, it's not a cold weather thing. It's the lights. They aren't the proper ones. They shouldn't get hot like that. It's just the Amazon lights seem to be hit or miss. I bet the Accel lights won't get hot like that.
 

roberthu526

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
1,220
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No, it's not a cold weather thing. It's the lights. They aren't the proper ones. They shouldn't get hot like that. It's just the Amazon lights seem to be hit or miss. I bet the Accel lights won't get hot like that.

Just found out that the accel light does not work anymore... it's only been a couple of weeks and I only tested it once for like 30 seconds. Contacted MD. Let's see what they say.
 

Oldreefer44

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
1,892
Location
Machias Washington
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Read an interesting article (believe it was in Politico, but not sure) that demonstrated that artificially grown algae is actually detrimental to the growth of healthy Zooplankton. It seems artificially grown algae does not contain the same nutrient levels that naturally grown algae does so that eventually the zooplankton starve. To me that makes the case for an algae reactor versus sump grown algae but remains to be seen if there is further evidence of what they found.
 

jerl77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
1,772
Reaction score
388
Location
long island ny
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Was thinking about trying to run the led lights
3 hours on
1 hour off
For a 24 hour period
Do you think this will have and benefits?????
 

Josh Kraft

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
764
Reaction score
509
Location
Tulsa, OK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Since building mine, I have started seeing pods all over the place, I've never seen pods crawling on my glass. They're all over the place now.
 
OP
OP
Forsaken77

Forsaken77

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,223
Location
Long Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Read an interesting article (believe it was in Politico, but not sure) that demonstrated that artificially grown algae is actually detrimental to the growth of healthy Zooplankton. It seems artificially grown algae does not contain the same nutrient levels that naturally grown algae does so that eventually the zooplankton starve. To me that makes the case for an algae reactor versus sump grown algae but remains to be seen if there is further evidence of what they found.

How would it be any different though, the sump grown vs reactor grown? It sounds like algae that forms naturally wouldn't be the artificially grown variety. You're still growing algae with an artificial light source and letting your tank water flow through it in both situations.

Some Pods also eat detritus and whatnot. I have pods in my sump without a stitch of algae down there for over a year. Lots of rock rubble though.

But that's very interesting because you would think the algae is uptaking nutrients faster in an artificial setting.
 

Aquatic acrobat in your aquarium: Have you ever kept an eel?

  • I currently keep an eel in my tank.

    Votes: 25 14.1%
  • I have kept an eel in my tank in the past.

    Votes: 30 16.9%
  • I have not kept an eel in my tank, but I hope to in the future.

    Votes: 27 15.3%
  • I have no plans to keep an eel.

    Votes: 92 52.0%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 1.7%
Back
Top