Experiment converting corals to freshwater

Status
Not open for further replies.

Eric1493

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
193
Reaction score
128
Location
Bowling Green
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yeah, if we can clone a dang sheep or bring back an extinct animal I'm sure we can get a coral to adapt to a different habit. People aren't getting the point
The sheep you are referring to died extremely prematurely, from lung disease. And there have been no extinct animals brought back.
 

Sharkbait19

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
11,638
Reaction score
13,151
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think you don't understand what evolution is. Evolution is the gradual change that results in natural selection favoring a group of organisms with a specific phenotype, which has a biological advantage. Evolution is NOT something that is induced.

I know what evolution is. Of course this isn’t a “1, 2, 3” experiment, but takes time like real evolution through reproduction.

A common bio class project is to take a culture of fruit flies,put them in specific conditions, and see how they evolve next to other cultures.Those are induced experiments. Evolution stems from available resources. If you can control them, you can push evolution into certain favors.

To address your second point, you are absolutely correct. There are multiple species that fit that description, including pandas. You should have actual evidence to back up your claims before you make them.

If there are multiple species that both you and I know fit that description, why would I need to give you evidence?? This isn’t a college essay. It’s a fish forum. Humans saving endangered species is well enough known by people, I don’t need to give examples.
 

Eric1493

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
193
Reaction score
128
Location
Bowling Green
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Still was born tho right? And there was an elk I'm pretty sure that was brought back I can't remember the name of it
There's a difference between the embryo of an animal that already exists being inserted into the same animal and living for less than half of its expected life under the supervision of some of the most trained scientists in the world, and someone with absolutely no scientific experience putting an organism into blatantly hostile environments with no regard for its safety and no evidence to claim that it will survive. And no. No such elk exists.
 

Sharkbait19

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
11,638
Reaction score
13,151
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think the OP needs to take more time to research and come up with a real plan, and a real hypothesis based on FACTS not guessing
All he said in the beginning is he’s doing an experiment. Maybe he’s still developing a hypothesis and that’s why he consulted this forum.
 

chipmunkofdoom2

Always Making Something
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
2,417
Reaction score
4,108
Location
Baltimore, MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There's a difference between the embryo of an animal that already exists being inserted into the same animal and living for less than half of its expected life under the supervision of some of the most trained scientists in the world, and someone with absolutely no scientific experience putting an organism into blatantly hostile environments with no regard for its safety and no evidence to claim that it will survive. And no. No such elk exists.

I used to be a normal human. In the last few years I've evolved a set of gills. I now can live on land or under water indefinitely. Anything is possible!
 

92Miata

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2020
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
2,358
Location
Richmond, VA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know what evolution is. Of course this isn’t a “1, 2, 3” experiment, but takes time like real evolution through reproduction.

If you think this "experiment" has anything to do with evolution, then you don't know what evolution is.


Again - whether or not corals could evolve to freshwater over millions of years has literally nothing to do with the OP putting a bunch of animals THAT ARE NOT SEXUALLY REPRODUCING in a box, and gradually killing them.


This is no different than putting a dog in a fish tank and slowly filling it with water, and expecting him to learn to breath water. It has exactly the same chance of success. Or putting a human being in a room and slowly sucking out the oxygen and expecting them to learn to convert CO2 into fresh oxygen.
 

McJaeger

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
29
Reaction score
21
Location
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yeah, if we can clone a dang sheep or bring back an extinct animal I'm sure we can get a coral to adapt to a different habit. People aren't getting the point
Evolution happens at a population level, not to individual organisms, so claims of induced evolution are misguided. The coral could eventually adapt to osmotic stress via epigenetic changes but the beneficial effects will be limited and wouldn't carry to the next generation. In order to create something akin a freshwater hydroid you'd need a way to create successive generations of genetically distinct organisms and hope that one of the offspring adapts to new environmental stressors. If you want to try it then power to you, but I highly doubt this work the way you envision it will.

Alternatively, you could dabble with gene editing. CRISPR kits are relatively cheap these days :D
 

Eric1493

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
193
Reaction score
128
Location
Bowling Green
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know what evolution is. Of course this isn’t a “1, 2, 3” experiment, but takes time like real evolution through reproduction.

A common bio class project is to take a culture of fruit flies,put them in specific conditions, and see how they evolve next to other cultures.Those are induced experiments. Evolution stems from available resources. If you can control them, you can push evolution into certain favors.

Again, you don't know what evolution is. Evolution is a GRADUAL process that takes eons to see a measurable, significant change in the genotype of a population. And secondly, that's not evolution. That's natural selection. There was no breeding of those fruit flies for hundreds of generations and gene sequencing. You could absolutely do the same experiment with zoanthids. PLace 100 polyps of zoanthids into freshwater and record the results. I guarantee you, there will be no survivors and no "induced evolution". There is a reason no zoanthids have evolved to adapt to freshwater. It may occur over the course of millions of years, because of small gene changes, but it will not occur over 10 years under incompetent supervision. That's just not how evolution works.
 

RJKain-777

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Messages
839
Reaction score
1,495
Location
Calgary
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Won’t work. Unless corals spawn every time you lower salinity, which they won’t since they need perfect parameters, you won’t be able to keep it alive. There’s also parameters that are needed that aren’t found in fresh water (don’t ask, I don’t know exactly what they are).
 

Eric1493

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
193
Reaction score
128
Location
Bowling Green
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If there are multiple species that both you and I know fit that description, why would I need to give you evidence?? This isn’t a college essay. It’s a fish forum. Humans saving endangered species is well enough known by people, I don’t need to give examples.
There's a difference between giving pandas shelter, food, and water and putting zoanthids into worse conditions, unsupervised, and for no plausible scientific reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 26.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 48 33.6%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 32 22.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 15 10.5%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.0%
Back
Top