Hmmm.. Slippery slope..
Then run 6500K MH's.. :)
(I didn't just say that did I? Please don't pass that on)
Or my array.. ;) (untested btw)
Needs minor tweaks like added cyan..and maybe a bit "deeper" violet.
Red will fade w/ depth..
not to mention "species dependencies"...
visual appeal/color/ growth are interdependent and mildly at odds w/ each other..
Photosynthetic organisms adapt well in general. Intensity being, arguably, more important than spectrum.
sorry for the "philosophy"..
No apologies for the philosophy/ it’s goid for discussion.
I disagree on the adaptability part, mostly. If your wavelengths don’t fall into those utilized by the proteins involved in photosynthesis or fluorescence, then you can’t compensate by throwing more at it. Zero x100% is still 0. And if I start off with an array that does 25% photosynthesis, making 4 modules is silly when I can redesign a better initial module with 50% and make two.
It’s why I’m hung up on the 12x k16, 12x suncool, 9 x violet array. I’ll need to buy another power supply, 16 more drivers, another 4’ heatsink... why? if a knock off photonv2 comes in with 1/3rd of the materials?
The ‘red decreases with depth’ is fine in the ocean- but even a 3w red led can penetrate the 24” of a typical tank. I know because the 6 red diodes on my black boxes put light on my sand and I can see the dots.
What’s your array? The k16 plus freshfish?
The ‘untested’ part is what gives me pause. I don’t have the time, cash or patience to test out a bunch of different profiles. It’s a one and done scenario for me- big enough for a 180, good growth and colour across softies, pls and sps, pleasing visual look, more on the white side during peak day hours, bluer in the morning and evening. Hate seeing windex between 9am and 5pm.
The array I posted was designed to compete with a friends $1300 pair of photon v2’s. It came with better profile and for $400. But this was almost 18months ago.
Again, appreciate the discussion