@PacificEastAquaculture / Dr. Mac, thank you for continuing to update Reef2Reef members on the ban situation(s). It is quite depressing to say the least.
I attended many MACNA presentations this year concerning the bans in Hawaii, Fiji, and Indonesia. These were given by Bruce Carlson, Walt Smith, a PIJAC workshop, and a panel that consisted of the aforementioned three along with Chris Buerner (owner of Quality Marine) and Bob Fenner (reef aquarium guru). The frustration behind all of their eyes was clear as day, as what we're seeing is a complete perversion of science, particularly in Hawaii.
Hawaii is one of, if not the best managed ornamental fisheries on the planet, where crystal clear data has been collected for years showing the aquarium fishery is sustainable. While the Hawaiian debate has been going on for (40+) years it took a turn for the worst when SB1240 was introduced. Bruce Carlson released a phenomenal video on this in 2016, but it only garnered ~17,000 views. Meanwhile the dodo puts up inaccurate articles that millions of people have read. When a fishery like Hawaii can be crippled so easily, a chain reaction can occur.
More than anything antitrade activists have the backing of large entities (Humane Society of the United States, Sea Shepard, and Wildlife Trafficking Alliance, to name a few) with lots of money to produce antitrade rhetoric. Every hobby-centric organization has failed due to hobbyists generally choosing cheap animals versus quality animals, and irresponsible management of the organizations.
And now we're seeing politics playing a big role, where emotion has shown significantly more power than science...
Nailed it.
I caught something in Walt's presentation that sent me down a wormhole. Walt mentioned that a Fijian diplomat had been appointed a new position. After some digging I found the diplomat is Peter Thomson, "a Fijian diplomat who served as President of the General Assembly of the United Nations from September 2016 until September 2017." Peter was recently appointed, "as the first special Envoy for the Oceans, seeking to galvanize efforts to protect the world's seas." (Source)
A new appointee of, well, anything is certain to make a name for themselves as fast as possible. What's an easier target than a (relatively) tiny industry with no central organization to fight back?
The hobby is a small fish in a big pond. Hopefully something can come to fruition that would emulate what public aquariums have in AZA or what the Australian ornamental fishery has done with Provision Reef. Because without it we will continue to see this domino effect as well managed fisheries fall prey to emotional diatribe.
-Austin Lefevre / @stunreefer
Thank you for your comments. You are correct that our industry suffers from not having a strong unified voice. This is due to rivalry and competition due to many oversized egos. I readily admit I'm not an expert, might have a lot of years in the business, but certainly always learning new things. A few years ago when there was a movement to ban certain coral species there was an appeal from an industry group to collect monetary donations from hobbyists. At the time I volunteered my services if needed. In a previous career I did lobbying in Wash DC and still have some contacts in Congress and am nearby. My emails and calls to the organization went unanswered, but the appeals for donations went on strong. Again, I'm not saying I had the answers or was the most connected guy, but an offer to help at no charge with no expectations for anything in return went unanswered repeatedly, even just to say no thanks or get lost. You know the old saying: follow the money, well add to that in our current situation follow the power and politics.