- Joined
- Feb 15, 2012
- Messages
- 4,925
- Reaction score
- 3,560
- What state or country do you live in
- Hawaii
PAR is actually reported as: 200-250 molm2sec (micromole per square meter per second) or 750-800 molm2sec, not W (watts).Yeah, when I went from T5 to MH my lps and soft corals suffered. on average I’m seeing 200-250w on the sand bed.
after a few months and creating some lower light locations the frogspawn and hammers are better. Not great, but better. The torch loves the light.
i plan to place plating monti to help shade corals...the monti are growing like mad.
overall, please I switched. One concern I don’t have, is enough light. Near the top I read 750-800 watts with the par meter But as said above, it’s just a metric, I let my eyes be the judge as to how the coral is doing under the MH at any particular spot.
The corals will only suffer when we don't adapt them correctly. If we do it slow they won't manifest anything wrong. You can see them adapting in terms of changing colors a bit in the process and sometimes they even stop growing in the beginning, but when they start to process and balance everything, including their zooxanthellae population, in the right rates, they get on track for their best growth and pigment production. I do not change them to a "better spot", never did. They don't need that at all. What we should do is to choose the best spot and leave them there, adapting the light slowly. Even the so called "deep water Acros" can support and do really well under halides at the top. So adaptation is the key. Trust me... any light change needs to happen slow and don't change it anymore. Only when changing bulbs. Try to get the same bulb always and adapt them to the new bulb. Changing spectrum or even ballasts could provoke new adaptation cycles. Not a big deal.
