Prime Does Not Remove Ammonia

OP
OP
Dan_P

Dan_P

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
9,881
Reaction score
9,744
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Dan_P and @Randy Holmes-Farley

This article shows up in another forum as a prove that Prime works


Any comments?

Sincerely Lasse
This is a rehash of many reviews. No new information. Sounds like something Seachem would spend time doing. Some supporting information seems misleading or a distraction at least. For some of the quoted studies, Taricha and I have shown where each have problems which call into question the conclusions of ammonia removal from solution. The Cloram-X patent is a lesson in “don’t use patent information as a source of scientific information.” Using Seachem’s own free ammonia detection film and several others, ammonia removal was never detected after using any ammonia detoxifying product.
 

Malcontent

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,420
Reaction score
1,304
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's one study cited as evidence that Prime detoxifies nitrite:


In environmental water samples that contain both nitrate and nitrite, isotopic analysis of nitrate alone by all currently available methods requires pretreatment to remove nitrite. Sulfamic acid addition, used previously for this purpose, is shown here to be compatible with the denitrifier method for both N and O isotope analysis of nitrate. Sulfamic acid at a pH of ∼1.7 reduces nitrite to N2.

Huh?
 

EnterName

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2025
Messages
980
Reaction score
2,238
Location
Germany
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's one study cited as evidence that Prime detoxifies nitrite:


In environmental water samples that contain both nitrate and nitrite, isotopic analysis of nitrate alone by all currently available methods requires pretreatment to remove nitrite. Sulfamic acid addition, used previously for this purpose, is shown here to be compatible with the denitrifier method for both N and O isotope analysis of nitrate. Sulfamic acid at a pH of ∼1.7 reduces nitrite to N2.

Huh?
Unfortunately it doesn't seem to say anything about ammonia. Nitrite isn't really an issue for reef tanks as you may know. I doubt we can just assume it does the same for ammonia.
 
Last edited:

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,742
Reaction score
31,473
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's one study cited as evidence that Prime detoxifies nitrite:




Huh?
In environmental water samples that contain both nitrate and nitrite, isotopic analysis of nitrate alone by all currently available methods requires pretreatment to remove nitrite. Sulfamic acid addition, used previously for this purpose, is shown here to be compatible with the denitrifier method for both N and O isotope analysis of nitrate. Sulfamic acid at a pH of ∼1.7 reduces nitrite to N2.
My bold
As I always say - read everything before conclusions are drawn. Is often you have pH around 1.7 in reeftanks

I have read the article and let us say - its full of experiment that makes you raise your eyebrows. Read this part that seems to be very well thought when yo first read it

Three solutions were prepared, one at a pH of 6, another at the default pH of 8 (the natural pH of the water at this facility, used as a Control) and a third at a pH of 11.

Prime was administered to two of the three vials below. The vial at a pH of 8 (center) had none, the vials at a pH of 6 (right) and 11 (left) were treated with Prime’s “Emergency Dose” (ED) of 5X the normal dose per 1PPM of desired reduction.

11-3vials.jpg.eded2ce3ff8b2658c7f34f1241e05240.jpg


All three vials tested positive for 2PPM of ammonia. Prime 5X (ED) removed 100% of the ammonia in about 3 HOURS:

12-3vials.jpg.422d42060bb99aac72e9a510de90f16a.jpg


For the reason detailed below however, Prime required 7 HOURS to remove the ammonium:

REPLACEMENTSLIDE3VIALS.jpg.c75739b7e641cb4cb41c1ce4f7299ae0.jpg


14-3vials.jpg.4f213cfe7d149fd498968ed31babad94.jpg


The difference in reduction time is that ammonium is less chemically active than ammonia and therefore requires more energy or time to reach the same level of reduction.

For either ammonia or ammonium to be reduced, it has to be converted to a more inert compound. As Prime et al are sulfur-based reducing agents, the ammonia and ammonium compounds should create sulfates.

In this case, the created sulfates are related to the Ammonium Sulfate family.

The vials treated with Prime now test positive for SULFATES:

18-sulfates.jpg.794a7b6ac697b1c5bb14c48cc73f6be9.jpg

And after that

During the three-hour reduction, we observed gas escaping, only from the Prime treated vials:

19-gasleaks.jpg.63e34da2affe4b4a23ab0ea4bd67cde0.jpg
For the sake of simplicity, I’ll take a bit more semantic license here. The reductive reaction taking place here results in the production of various gasses. Nitrogen, Oxygen, Hydrogen and Sulfur Dioxide should be liberated in this process (it can take the form of nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen compounds in gaseous forms as well but again for simplicity, I’ll be referring to these as their parent elements and compound: N, O, H and SO2).

The author say that the gas leaking out but forget to tell that at pH 11 - the ammonia is precent as a gas and his "prime reduction" of ammonia can in reality be that the tube lost ammonia in form of gas and no reduction

Sincerely Lasse
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,464
Reaction score
15,831
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Dan_P and @Randy Holmes-Farley

This article shows up in another forum as a prove that Prime works


Any comments?

Sincerely Lasse
Looks like a shill article to me.
pH, no controls, excuses about sulfate and hedging on kit accuracy and noise.

There was an article somewhere a year or so ago that debunked it by doing the same basic test (actually 3 independent tests if I remember correctly) with controls (no prime) and showed the high pH off gas showed the same result without prime. I bookmarked somewhere, but can't find it.
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,464
Reaction score
15,831
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
presto!

 

ISpeakForTheSeas

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Messages
9,376
Reaction score
10,776
Location
United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
presto!

Ah, yeah - Taricha's work here (interesting stuff):
Just with regards to Prime - some recent work from the Chemistry Forum here very strongly suggests (honestly, seems about as close to proving it as possible without Seachem releasing their proprietary formula information for it) that it is not useful for binding meaningful quantities of ammonia.

taricha explains in depth why throughout the thread, but for the shortened version, posts 158 (my post, partially quoted below) and 165 (taricha's post adding to mine) are a good, abbreviated explanation:
to summarize it briefly:

-The binder theoretically works, but nowhere near effectively enough to be useful for ammonia removal in our tanks.

-The binder itself seems to be more toxic than the ammonia it's attempting to bind.

-Tests showing that the binder bound useful amounts of ammonia are explained by test kit interference caused by the chemicals involved in the binding process.
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,464
Reaction score
15,831
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So somewhat circular reference here, but still valid to me as showing that Prime doesn't do what is advertised.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,652
Reaction score
93,106
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
@Dan_P and @Randy Holmes-Farley

This article shows up in another forum as a prove that Prime works


Any comments?

Sincerely Lasse

I stopped reading that “summary” which was claimed to be reviewed for accuracy when I got a very short way into it and they claimed:


“Contains Complexed Hydrosulfite Salts”

On the Seachem Prime® bottle, you’ll find only the above statement and little else about what it contains.

The most likely suspect in that vague description is Sodium Dithionite, a chemical designed in 1904 by BASF. This same chemical is also known as Sodium Hydrosulfite and Sodium Bisulfite.

It is largely used as a ‘reducing agent’ which simply means it ‘reduces’ a target chemical(s) from a stable form (resisting change) to an unstable one that degrades into something that is easily dissolved, dissipated (like a gas), precipitated, or converted to something innocuous.

Checked for accuracy? Seachem literally states the product is not dithionite. They state it in the letter written to challenge the aquarium science article, which reposts it:

 

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,742
Reaction score
31,473
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I stopped reading that “summary” which was claimed to be reviewed for accuracy when I got a very short way into it and they claimed:


“Contains Complexed Hydrosulfite Salts”

On the Seachem Prime® bottle, you’ll find only the above statement and little else about what it contains.

The most likely suspect in that vague description is Sodium Dithionite, a chemical designed in 1904 by BASF. This same chemical is also known as Sodium Hydrosulfite and Sodium Bisulfite.

It is largely used as a ‘reducing agent’ which simply means it ‘reduces’ a target chemical(s) from a stable form (resisting change) to an unstable one that degrades into something that is easily dissolved, dissipated (like a gas), precipitated, or converted to something innocuous.

Checked for accuracy? Seachem literally states the product is not dithionite. They state it in the letter written to challenge the aquarium science article, which reposts it:

Thank´s

Sincerely Lasse
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top