Question about biopellets

@Lasse opened my mind to a better approach to carbon dosing where he feeds a reactor and monitors the effluent to adjust dosing. At least that's how I interpreted it.

Seems like the best of both worlds with Bio-pellets and dosing in that you target dose into media to get the accelerated benefits without dosing the display having less impact on co2 creation.

In place of bio-pellets fill it with a media to house bacteria then dose directly into this reactor ensuring there are detectable results to avoid hydrogen sulfide as best I understood him. Caveat being he uses a large reactor similar to my approach and not sure how small it can go. Have assumed reason I didn't see bacterial blooms even when overdosing at 2x to 5x recommended being my media was 25% total display volume.

Had looked into bio-pellets in 2015 when getting back into the hobby as nitrate maintenance part of the reason I exited due to time constraints due to life and work and it look extremely promising until I discovered carbon dosing although having not used it was still a learning curb such as it's impact on co2 and my struggles with pH I hadn't yet correlated until @Randy Holmes-Farley made that clear to me.

This co2 impact had me once again going back to macroalgae as a means of managing that final step in aquarium decomposition but with this new learned approach to direct dosing then perhaps I can avoid the hassle of a refugium or ATS or at a minimum reduce the size of either as they still hold benefits yet dosing media which can be controlled and monitored seems more fool proof.

Food for thought on reactor size needed being one can potentially replace socks, roller mats and space needed for said refugium or ATS and flexibility in utilizing several reactors in series to provide the needed media volume required. Also adds flexibility for those lacking a sump as this can be plumbed similar to running a canister filter. Key being ability to dose directly and issue I'm still working on solving with my attempt at replicating this approach.

Plus lack the patience to wait months for pellets to start working or the potential constant tuning needed as life grows or conditions evolve.

Both aerobic and anaerobic (denitrification) metabolism of organics make the same amount of CO2 for the same amount of organic metabolized.

One could argue that denitrification makes less CO2 per nitrate consumed since denitrification may consume more nitrate than aerobic tissue growth per unit of organic added, but that’s a hypothesis awaiting verification.
 
From BRS website:

BRS Bulk Biopellets are made from 100% natural Polyhydroxyalkanoates or PHA and are an excellent solid carbon source for denitrifying bacteria in the aquarium.

Are all biopellets made with this organic compound?

Will this grow different types of bacteria than ethanol or vinegar?

Just curious. I might have more questions. I’ve never tried this type of product, and I’m curious on how it works.
My experience
Start with 1/4 of recommended amounts
Have a good skimmer it is a must
Get good bio pellets reactor,
It works but it takes a while
I don’t run it anymore,
I did sulfur reactor and that was better for me.
Currently experimenting with turf scrubber and NP balance doses.
I am want to try vodka especially after seeing dosing chart
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT KIND OF SUBSTRATE ARE YOU RUNNING ON YOUR TANK?

  • Bare bottom

    Votes: 7 17.5%
  • A shallow bed of fine sand

    Votes: 8 20.0%
  • A shallow bed of coarser sand

    Votes: 10 25.0%
  • A deep sand bed

    Votes: 5 12.5%
  • Mixed substrate or varying sand depth

    Votes: 10 25.0%
  • Some other substrate (posted in the comments)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don’t have a reef tank yet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new