- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Messages
- 1,165
- Reaction score
- 284
How are the results with this mehtode compared to kz? Do still use some kz products aminos...?I’m very happy with the shine so far. Transitioning from KZ. I’m 3 months in I believe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How are the results with this mehtode compared to kz? Do still use some kz products aminos...?I’m very happy with the shine so far. Transitioning from KZ. I’m 3 months in I believe.
Im in the same boat as I use the DSR EZ trace elements in all my systems from day one and I think my colors are respectable.I'm a bit loosen with the different methods here trace elements are very important,but when I see the stunning growth and colors of the guys that use the dsr methods which use as only trace Potassium, Sulfate, Boron, Iodine and Manganese and no water change, I'm asking how this can work and if we really needs the other traces elements??
Yea those colors are pretty normal from many of the tanks I have seen.I haven’t seen anybody's colors more vivid than those I see with shine. If somebody can post a legit daylight pic that beats this…please do. Note this black frag rack is black and not completely UV’ed or Royal’ed out. Also note the white frag plugs.
![]()
Not even close bro. If you think so, post it up. Let’s compare.Yea those colors are pretty normal from many of the tanks I have seen.
If you put some of those corals in my tank they would look the same as I have similar colors but on different corals. To say ones better than the next is trivial at best.
Bottom line the shine system works and so do many others.
Many of the people running similar colored systems dont broadcast their tanks here or anywhere for that matter.
Pick the system you want and go for it is what I say.
And yes Glenn Fongs EZ systems are one of them and they speak for themselves.
I do look forward to watching your system develope with the shine system as I will be following it.
We have talked before and you can see my pics on my build. This is my last post as I am not argueing that this is better than that. I have been at this for over 30 years. To say not even close is a shame and thats being nice.Not even close bro. If you think so, post it up. Let’s compare.
I’m having even greater success with the shine. I tried adding in acropower for a few months. No difference. Took it offline. There are many ways to have a successful reef tank. For me the moonshine method has been the best.How are the results with this mehtode compared to kz? Do still use some kz products aminos...?
I’ve seen your build thread. The corals are great, your tank is nice, and the colors are good, but I think Andre has you beat bro. It’s ok though, because he has me beat too. Nothing personal. To say the daylight pic above is average makes me chuckle inside. His tank is far from average and everybody knows it which is why every day I see more and more people coming into the group and starting the Shine. I’ll be dead honest with you too. I have not see even one person that doesn’t like his program. People that come in are consistently saying the same thing…”Corals are looking better everyday.” Or…”My growth has been exploding since I’ve started the program.” Or…”My corals have never looked better.” The only reason why I promote his program is because I only promote things I believe in that I’ve used personally on my own reef. Anything that makes a system this stable and helps achieve this kind of success is something that I can’t ignore. When I see my microbiome come into balance and the corals looking so healthy it puts a smile on my face.We have talked before and you can see my pics on my build. This is my last post as I am not argueing that this is better than that. I have been at this for over 30 years. To say not even close is a shame and thats being nice.
Have a great night.
Have there been any commonalites of certain elements across many users that has made a difference or maybe levels higher than NSW?
I’ve seen your build thread. The corals are great, your tank is nice, and the colors are good, but I think Andre has you beat bro. It’s ok though, because he has me beat too. Nothing personal. To say the daylight pic above is average makes me chuckle inside. His tank is far from average and everybody knows it which is why every day I see more and more people coming into the group and starting the Shine. I’ll be dead honest with you too. I have not see even one person that doesn’t like his program. People that come in are consistently saying the same thing…”Corals are looking better everyday.” Or…”My growth has been exploding since I’ve started the program.” Or…”My corals have never looked better.” The only reason why I promote his program is because I only promote things I believe in that I’ve used personally on my own reef. Anything that makes a system this stable and helps achieve this kind of success is something that I can’t ignore. When I see my microbiome come into balance and the corals looking so healthy it puts a smile on my face.
Also, let me be clear…despite what some may think…I don’t get a dime from Andre. He doesn’t sponsor my YouTube channel or send me any money at all. Just want to throw that out there. If you don’t believe me, go look at ReefDudes channel. You’ll see Andre’s logo, because he does sponsor his channel. Check out this video below and tell me he’s not passionate. ;)
BTW…when I met Andre 10 years ago, the dude was playing with trace elements and color which is why I trust his program. He’s been jacking with this stuff for a long time and he’s a freak about sourcing quality product’s that don’t introduce any pollutants. He’s all about purity.
Good question. From personal experience and from what I see on the FB group (from my limited time scanning through) I would say barium, molybdenum, strontium, flouride and sometimes potassium seem to be part of the monthly corrections. I can't speak for others, but these elements are pretty much the ones I dose on a monthly basis. There are a few others as well, but their corrections seem to be lower or not every month. I'll actually post this question with the group and see what everyone has to say. It would be very interesting to see what everyone is dosing.Have there been any commonalites of certain elements across many users that has made a difference or maybe levels higher than NSW?
Good question. From personal experience and from what I see on the FB group (from my limited time scanning through) I would say barium, molybdenum, strontium, flouride and sometimes potassium seem to be part of the monthly corrections. I can't speak for others, but these elements are pretty much the ones I dose on a monthly basis. There are a few others as well, but their corrections seem to be lower or not every month. I'll actually post this question with the group and see what everyone has to say. It would be very interesting to see what everyone is dosing.
would an elevated level of barium lead to a slower consumption of calcium? my ICP results showed high barium, but my weekly testing is indicating low usage of calcium with a slight increase in ALK(went from 8.3dkh to 8.7 to 8.9 in 3 weeks?). i am leaning towards test error, but i'm uneducated in the relationship of certain trace elements and the major 3.For example, I expect barium to get depleted (without any dosing) as it will be readily incorporated into calcium carbonate in place of calcium.
I know one common issue with low barium among people in the group, is STN/RTN. I'm not saying it caused the event, but reading through these posts about RTN, barium was one of the "low" elements during an RTN/STN event. I think we would have to do long term experiments with individual elements and see what would happen? Myself, I like the idea of maintaining chemistry with this method and it simply works.I think the question is not so much what is needed to dose to maintain levels, but what happens if you do not maintain them (or maintain them at different levels).
For example, I expect barium to get depleted (without any dosing) as it will be readily incorporated into calcium carbonate in place of calcium.
The question is whether the actual concentration of barium matters at all. I'm personally quite skeptical of that one since barium has no known biological role in any organism.
would an elevated level of barium lead to a slower consumption of calcium? my ICP results showed high barium, but my weekly testing is indicating low usage of calcium with a slight increase in ALK(went from 8.3dkh to 8.7 to 8.9 in 3 weeks?). i am leaning towards test error, but i'm uneducated in the relationship of certain trace elements and the major 3.
I did my first ICP test at 2.5 years and barium was 25 ug/l range was 0-10.I doubt barium is high enough to notice the effect that way. Even when very high (say, 1 ppm), it would be a thousand times lower in concentration that the calcium.