Saltmix Parameters bring on the test results

hawkinsrgk

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
1,363
Reaction score
238
Location
Hoover, AL.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you for bumping this thread. I was surprised that manganese was so high in the IO mix
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It could vary from batch to batch and the results may not be 100% accurate but certainly something close enough to expect. :)


Looks like I need to buy some more DI. I'll get this started again after I get some more in.

Edit: except maybe Si. I seem to have very high Si in my water supply and even when reading 0 TDS when my DI is close to exhausting my Si starts rising. My sponges are happy when that happens. But for this testing I do make sure my DI is fresh.
 
Last edited:

Big E

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
2,257
Reaction score
3,632
Location
Willoughby, OH
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thank you for bumping this thread. I was surprised that manganese was so high in the IO mix

From what I have been tracking Mn is high in the majority of salt brand mixes. Triton's results have also been shown to read almost 400% high per a known standard that was tested.

http://packedhead.net/2015/triton-lab-icp-oes-testing-of-a-certified-artificial-saltwater-standard/

From the article linked above----

" The manganese value (see Table 1) in the standard is 10.3 µg/l, and the average of the three measurements performed by Triton Lab of this reference standard is 50.88 µg/l, with a 95% chance that any measurement of manganese will fall between 50.66 and 51.10 µg/l, again based on the distribution of the three replicates. In relative terms, the Triton test returned a result for manganese inaccurate by (difference between known and measured values, divided by the known value) 396.42%."
 

hawkinsrgk

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
1,363
Reaction score
238
Location
Hoover, AL.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you Big E and also thank you for all of the information that you have shared on ATI T5 bulb combinations.

If I am understanding correctly, if the Triton is off by 400% for Mn, how can we trust other values for trace elements?
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thank you Big E and also thank you for all of the information that you have shared on ATI T5 bulb combinations.

If I am understanding correctly, if the Triton is off by 400% for Mn, how can we trust other values for trace elements?

Depends on how much you want to trust it. I wouldn't trust it to dose anything based on a single result. It's much better utilized as a long term trend analysis.

http://packedhead.net/2015/triton-lab-icp-oes-testing-of-a-certified-artificial-saltwater-standard/

http://www.reefedition.com/my-triton-testing-results-by-randy-holmes-farley/
 

Big E

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
2,257
Reaction score
3,632
Location
Willoughby, OH
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thank you Big E and also thank you for all of the information that you have shared on ATI T5 bulb combinations.

If I am understanding correctly, if the Triton is off by 400% for Mn, how can we trust other values for trace elements?

I agree with what Jason said above, that the whole battery of tests are useful as a trend analysis. I wouldn't dose some of those trace elements based on some of the inaccuracies unless verified with another independent source.

Fauna Marin is doing these all in one tests as well but I have no info on them being available in the states yet.

I picked up a suggestion to this company from another forum, I have no info other than the link--
http://enclabs.com/index.html
 

Kungpaoshizi

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
1,309
Reaction score
513
Location
Earf
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Here's some of mine, though I believe the only true admissible one is the RSCP. (the fluval was the one with the pump I discovered was rusty; the first fluval was 1.023-24 iirc, been awhile) I also suspected the manganese in the fluval was the cause of corals having reduced polyp extension, though it was speculation.

Fluval1:
FluvalFresh.png FluvalFresh2.png FluvalFresh3.png FluvalFresh4.png FluvalFresh5.png


Fluval 1.025:
FluvalFresh-1.025.png FluvalFresh-1.025-2.png FluvalFresh-1.025-3.png FluvalFresh-1.025-4.png FluvalFresh-1.025-5.png


RSCP 1.025:
RSCP-1.025.png RSCP-1.025-2.png RSCP-1.025-3.png RSCP-1.025-4.png RSCP-1.025-5.png
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
***

Aquaforest Reef Salt.

This is not the probiotic version. I looked at their parameters as posted by aquaforest and looked pretty similar between the main 3 Alk, Ca, and Mg. Triton and I are not going to be able to test for those organics and figured its not worth the time or money to test both versions. I did get the basic marine salt and will do that one next.

There is listed slightly more Iron in the non-probiotic version which I would figure it would be the other way around as some microbes to uptake Fe. The Probiotic version includes Br but this version says it does NOT. We'll see

300519a28c1e8c4f945bc2546115c828.jpg


914bb41de64616115829ae3a51337e62.jpg


It came with this little sheet

0bb560827ec54f0d50e890328ea0330c.jpg


Description on their site:
Designed for aquariums with more demanding SPS and LPS corals. It does not contain bromides and can be used with the assisted by ozone filtration. It does not contain any probiotic bacteria or growth media. Phosphate and nitrate free. Upon filling new marine tanks it is recommended to let animals in not earlier than after 10-14 days.

And their website gives these ranges
59509f990a509efb4c06b43f89a7ee8e.jpg

Looks like you need to read between some lines for aquaforest. The parameters listed and QC tested look to be for 33ppt.

Also, just noticed the bucket says Low Bromide and their site description says no bromide. Will find out soon enough with in Triton's LOD.

At a high 35ppt
Salifert Ca: 475
Salifert Alk: 8.6
Salifert Mg: 1590

Doing this one again. Triton had some technical issues when I sent this one in annd they sent me back a new envelope to send in a new sample.

I have mixed it up to possibly a hair under 35ppt but I'm happy with the numbers tested and lines up with previous tests listed above and lines up with the line looking a hair under 35ppt this time.

Ca: 450
Alk: 8.16
Mg: 1560

Looking forward to seeing what their definition of low Br is.
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Doesn't look like low Br to me. Not significantly lower then any other saltmix

There's an issue with me getting on their website right now on my phone so took some pictures from my laptop screen.

f8f5c3ab47b78e3c972c57e662083493.jpg


18f5d5ec44f1c0bd526023c5b727779f.jpg


e05ab420e00b1d70727a1beab9574196.jpg


7e1a3b9b610b42ce6aa10a53f239ff70.jpg
 

gettaReef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
1,003
Reaction score
217
Location
Coralville, IA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi there, thank you for doing all of this, and for sharing your results! It has been very interesting and super helpful to me, and many others I'm sure.
I was wondering if you've had the chance (or plan to in the future) to test out Fritz salt mix? If you have already and posted the results, forgive me, I am being lazy and figured I'd just ask. Thank you again!
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi there, thank you for doing all of this, and for sharing your results! It has been very interesting and super helpful to me, and many others I'm sure.
I was wondering if you've had the chance (or plan to in the future) to test out Fritz salt mix? If you have already and posted the results, forgive me, I am being lazy and figured I'd just ask. Thank you again!

I haven't done Fritz yet. Eventually, if I can find it, I probably will. Up coming will be Aquaforest Probiotic, Red Sea Coral Pro, and Coralife.
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Speaking of which...

Aquaforest Probiotic Reef Salt

278df149c74c4e8a694a9c630df0af1e.jpg


e9d3dfb917c17f3423a3edcc457cfd55.jpg


Supposed to be QC'd to
2b4ca06eaa07cb456ef38073dca3e1c1.jpg


Keep in mind those are at 33ppt.

Tried to match the salinity mark I had for the Reef blend to get as close of a comparison as I could between the two.

So, at a low 35ppt
Ca: 420
Alk: 7.04
Mg: 1485
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi there, thank you for doing all of this, and for sharing your results! It has been very interesting and super helpful to me, and many others I'm sure.
I was wondering if you've had the chance (or plan to in the future) to test out Fritz salt mix? If you have already and posted the results, forgive me, I am being lazy and figured I'd just ask. Thank you again!

I haven't done Fritz yet. Eventually, if I can find it, I probably will. Up coming will be Aquaforest Probiotic, Red Sea Coral Pro, and Coralife.


FYI there are two results under the Ca/Alk/Mg only results submitted by others updated on the first page of this thread.
 

dragon99

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Messages
2,852
Reaction score
4,262
Location
Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you tracking how much salt (by weight) each brand takes to reach 35ppt? I'm curious if there's much variation between brands and if the claimed gal per box/bucket is accurate.
 
OP
OP
jason2459

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,189
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are you tracking how much salt (by weight) each brand takes to reach 35ppt? I'm curious if there's much variation between brands and if the claimed gal per box/bucket is accurate.


They've all been around 45-47g/L to mix to ~35ppt
 

Kungpaoshizi

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
1,309
Reaction score
513
Location
Earf
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The above tests are Aquaforest? Curious to see the Sulphur/moly/barium that off from setpoint.. I believe that limited amount of Sulphur would surely hinder anaerobic denitrification?
 

More than just hot air: Is there a Pufferfish in your aquarium?

  • There is currently a pufferfish in my aquarium.

    Votes: 32 17.5%
  • There is not currently a pufferfish in my aquarium, but I have kept one in the past.

    Votes: 31 16.9%
  • There has never been a pufferfish in my aquarium, but I plan to keep one in the future.

    Votes: 33 18.0%
  • I have no plans to keep a pufferfish in my aquarium.

    Votes: 79 43.2%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 4.4%
Back
Top