Sharks and rays with copper

kws82590

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 20, 2023
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Location
metro detroit
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I want to start off by saying i currently do NOT have any shark or Stingrays in my system but i was wondering is even small traces of copper deadly to sharks and rays? I’m currently getting a reading of 30ppb or .03ppm of copper in my system.
 

Jay Hemdal

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 31, 2020
Messages
37,573
Reaction score
37,370
Location
Dundee, MI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I want to start off by saying i currently do NOT have any shark or Stingrays in my system but i was wondering is even small traces of copper deadly to sharks and rays? I’m currently getting a reading of 30ppb or .03ppm of copper in my system.

It depends on what form the copper is in. If this is residual copper from a treatment with an amine-based copper medication (coppersafe or copper power) that would be completely safe. If it is from ionic copper, there could be an issue in that the upper limit I like to see with that is 0.05 ppm.

Don't forget - your 0.03 reading (on a Hanna test?) could be at the lower limit of the testing range, and you also need to factor in the accuracy of the device.

Jay
 
OP
OP
K

kws82590

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 20, 2023
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Location
metro detroit
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It depends on what form the copper is in. If this is residual copper from a treatment with an amine-based copper medication (coppersafe or copper power) that would be completely safe. If it is from ionic copper, there could be an issue in that the upper limit I like to see with that is 0.05 ppm.

Don't forget - your 0.03 reading (on a Hanna test?) could be at the lower limit of the testing range, and you also need to factor in the accuracy of the device.

Jay
Copper power was used and i was using the Hanna low range tester witch reads in PPB i tested three times in a row and all three test were between 30-35ppb
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top