Lasses Dream Build

OP
OP
Lasse

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,662
Reaction score
31,353
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A person on a Swedish online forum asked me why I didn't use an aluminum-based phosphate absorber instead of GFO. In his experience, Al-based absorbers were more effective in terms of phosphate. That's my experience too, but my latest ICP showed about 40 µg/L Al. That's the cutoff point for me and then I'll stop using Al-based removers for a while - the iron-based ones take Al too. I usually mix them normally

I follow the levels carefully

1738146214572.png


OCEAMO has analyzed the effect of different absorbers on macro, trace elements and pollutants here. The study is done as a lab test - low flow, spiked samples and lots of absorbers so it probably doesn't fully reflect what happens in an aquarium but gives some guidance. It also includes Zeolite and activated carbon.

Al based media and GFO media



1738146342188.png
1738146398701.png

The second reason is that I have some trace elements that are starting to approach my upper cut-off value - want to bring them down a bit. GFO (the iron-based one) has proven to be very effective at this.

Al-based and GFO based

1738146510811.png
1738146656209.png

A third reason is that my iron-based (ATI) will be clogged at the end of its life cycle and since I plan to dose some Lanthanum just before I change the media, it will be an excellent fine filter for the Lanthanum/PO4 flocs

Once I have better control over my PO4, I will run mixed again - predominantly Al - if I run phosphate precipitation with solid media.

Read the article from OCEAMO - it provides excellent information

My measurements today PO4 0.52 and NO3 7.2 - Hanna Marin Master

Sincerely Lasse
 

fishguy242

Cronies..... INSERT BUILD THREAD BADGE HERE !!
View Badges
Joined
Jan 21, 2020
Messages
50,683
Reaction score
256,416
Location
Illinois
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Happy Birthday Lasse !! may it be a good one... :winking-face: :)
 

Crabs McJones

Regional Reef Manager (AKA Revhtree's Boss)
View Badges
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Messages
33,586
Reaction score
153,815
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
3   0   0

Daniel@R2R

Living the Reef Life
View Badges
Joined
Nov 18, 2012
Messages
40,378
Reaction score
67,427
Location
Fontana, California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Happy birthday @Lasse! We appreciate all the ways you have been such a blessing to our community!
 
OP
OP
Lasse

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,662
Reaction score
31,353
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Back home since a week and everything works out well during my vacation. Still fighting my phosphate - now down to around 0.3 - 0.36. I have tested with LaCl - very weak solution in two different ways - trough a filter and through my skimmer - not very good results at all. Still i think that's my GFO and Al absorber does the best job. I tested a weak concentration slowly injected into my skimmer intake (0.1 ml/minute). Unfortunately, it skimmed over and my "shutdown" sensor didn't work - all the phosphorus-rich water in the skimmer cup flowed back into the sump. I'll just have to try it again. The sensor works now!

Sincerely Lasse
 
OP
OP
Lasse

Lasse

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
12,662
Reaction score
31,353
Location
Källarliden 14 D Bohus, Sweden
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did a new test with adding LaCl in the skimmer intake. Half a hour later I read 0.26 mg/L on my Hanna Marine Master. Looks lie it works - will run tomorrow too

Sincerely Lasse
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.6%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 31 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.1%
Back
Top