Need help to identify DINO? WHT IS THIS?!

Tux

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2024
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
Location
Clovis
What state or country do you live in
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure what this is. It covers my glass in an hour or two. Even after a water change. My sand seem clean and white. Fish seem healthy. Some say SCA and to ME it looks really small. Almost like Prynesium Parvum? In these videos it only shows the small Little creature but when I was looking earlier and taking some samples it had some bigger boys in there. But now its all this. This is what is on my glass. Videos are forma cheap microscope at 200x? it says? 250? So is this SCA with bad magnification? Idk i need help.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8663 (1).MOV
    15 MB
OP provided more photos in another thread and this thread is still marked as unanswered, so I put together everything I found here:
IMG_8599 (1).jpeg

(Image provided by OP)
I pointed out the gap between (what I'm assuming to be) the epicone and hypocone (black arrowheads in the images below). This is a good indication that we're dealing with dinoflagellates, at least for the large cells:
1787672984102.png
1787696133542.png

(visible gap between epicone and hypocone)
The small cells are harder to identify due to the lack of resolution. Their movement fits small cell Amphidinium spp., but it's possible that these cells aren't dinoflagellates at all.
1787693555284.png
 
Last edited:
OP provided more photos in another thread and this thread is still marked as unanswered, so I put together everything I found here:
IMG_8599 (1).jpeg

(Image provided by OP)
I pointed out the gap between (what I'm assuming to be) the epicone and hypocone (black arrowheads in the images below). This is a good indication that we're dealing with dinoflagellates, at least for the large cells:
1787672984102.png
1787696133542.png

(visible gap between epicone and hypocone)
The small cells are harder to identify due to the lack of resolution. Their movement fits small cell Amphidinium spp., but it's possible that these cells aren't dinoflagellates at all.
1787693555284.png

View attachment 4535522
I’ll be doing a little more testing tonight to see if I can get any more information
 
OP provided more photos in another thread and this thread is still marked as unanswered, so I put together everything I found here:
IMG_8599 (1).jpeg

(Image provided by OP)
I pointed out the gap between (what I'm assuming to be) the epicone and hypocone (black arrowheads in the images below). This is a good indication that we're dealing with dinoflagellates, at least for the large cells:
1787672984102.png
1787696133542.png

(visible gap between epicone and hypocone)
The small cells are harder to identify due to the lack of resolution. Their movement fits small cell Amphidinium spp., but it's possible that these cells aren't dinoflagellates at all.
1787693555284.png

View attachment 4535522
I’ll be doing a little more testing tonight to see if I can get any more information
Well I got another video. Not BETTER. Just another. Like I am limited in the microscope department. These things are SMALL. Whatever they are.

 
OP provided more photos in another thread and this thread is still marked as unanswered, so I put together everything I found here:
IMG_8599 (1).jpeg

(Image provided by OP)
I pointed out the gap between (what I'm assuming to be) the epicone and hypocone (black arrowheads in the images below). This is a good indication that we're dealing with dinoflagellates, at least for the large cells:
1787672984102.png
1787696133542.png

(visible gap between epicone and hypocone)
The small cells are harder to identify due to the lack of resolution. Their movement fits small cell Amphidinium spp., but it's possible that these cells aren't dinoflagellates at all.
1787693555284.png

View attachment 4535522
I’ll be doing a little more testing tonight to see if I can get any more information
Well I got another video. Not BETTER. Just another. Like I am limited in the microscope department. These things are SMALL. Whatever they are.

View attachment 4535600
 
OP provided more photos in another thread and this thread is still marked as unanswered, so I put together everything I found here:
IMG_8599 (1).jpeg

(Image provided by OP)
I pointed out the gap between (what I'm assuming to be) the epicone and hypocone (black arrowheads in the images below). This is a good indication that we're dealing with dinoflagellates, at least for the large cells:
1787672984102.png
1787696133542.png

(visible gap between epicone and hypocone)
The small cells are harder to identify due to the lack of resolution. Their movement fits small cell Amphidinium spp., but it's possible that these cells aren't dinoflagellates at all.
1787693555284.png

I’ve always found psychopath riddles interesting because they challenge you to think beyond the obvious answer. The best ones use misleading details and unexpected logic, making you question your first assumption before revealing the solution.
I’d say it’s more likely some type of dinoflagellate or other microalgae, but I wouldn’t try to identify the exact species from a 200–250× video alone. The rapid regrowth on the glass is definitely consistent with a bloom. I’d get a clearer microscope video if possible, especially showing how the organisms move, and post your nitrate and phosphate levels as well. I wouldn’t start dosing for dinos until you’re reasonably sure that’s what you’re dealing with.
 
I’d say it’s more likely some type of dinoflagellate or other microalgae, but I wouldn’t try to identify the exact species from a 200–250× video alone.
Species-level identification wouldn't be possible anyway without electron microscope which might slightly be outside OP's budget 😂

Genus level works quite often with visual clues but the magnification is too low. For me it was more important to identify if it's really a dinoflagellate issue or something else so I compared the morphology to those dinoflagellates that are commonly found in reef tanks.

I wouldn’t start dosing for dinos until you’re reasonably sure that’s what you’re dealing with.
Silicate dosing should be fine as long as the small cells aren't Chrysophytes (there was a video showing their rapid movement so Chrysophytes seem less likely). OP already started so I think neither continuing nor stopping would hurt much.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 13 28.9%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 11 24.4%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 9 20.0%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 8 17.8%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 4.4%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 4 8.9%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 1 2.2%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new