Yes,. you are right , we'll be supporting only two-point calibration. Its not because of just its hard to implement three-point calibration, I didn't find many documentation or documentation that can be generic enough for different types of probes. More, over its not clear if the proprietary three-point calibration techniques are basically two independent two-point calibrations or utilize some specific empirical coefficient. From my limited reading, my learning was one can fairly reliability use two-point calibration as long as the measurement range is within the calibration range (acidic or alkaline). The implementation I am doing for ph is not aware of the scale,. it only cares about expected and observed measurement. So, you can use ph 7 and ph 4 as calibration point and use it for freshwater tanks, or calibrate with ph7 and 10 and use it for marine tanks, or just use one point calibration. I am yet to discover the impact of this. I am approaching this systematically, currently charting the raw voltage, while taking a parallel reading using atlas probe+chip, swapping different probes (American marine and milawukee) with and without the calibration applied. I am also taking parallel readings hanna ph checker (the white electronice hand held device). I'll keep you posted. Meanwhile, if you have any suggestion, please do let us know here. It will be awesome if one of us start a thread on this in the chemistry sub forum. I am really enjoying exploring all these calibration, analog converstion, testing different probes part :-)@Ranjib
Did I read previously that the ph board is only going to have 2 point calibration at ph 7 and ph 10?
What does that do for anyone in freshwater who is looking at a below 7 ph?
If the logic of a 3 point calibration is too hard to implement, would it be possible to allow a choice in 2 point calibration one being ph7 and ph10 and the other choice being ph4 and ph7?
Im wondering about the accuracy in acidic conditions if the probe is calibrated for alkaline ph.
