Which Doser?

Sangheili

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
652
Reaction score
114
Location
Just outside Las Vegas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
At this point, the only doser I recommend for Triton on a 100g+ system is Apex DOS. Read my post in the other doser thread for the reasons why. They are very expensive but there is nothing else comparable aside from ColeParmer units.

Non-stepper pump units simply cannot survive the massive amount of liquids that need to be moved on a mature Triton tank. Regular brushed doser motors last 200-400hrs depending on source. The tubing in the heads lasts even less.
 
OP
OP
d2mini

d2mini

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
5,141
Reaction score
8,415
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
At this point, the only doser I recommend for Triton on a 100g+ system is Apex DOS. Read my post in the other doser thread for the reasons why. They are very expensive but there is nothing else comparable aside from ColeParmer units.

Non-stepper pump units simply cannot survive the massive amount of liquids that need to be moved on a mature Triton tank. Regular brushed doser motors last 200-400hrs depending on source. The tubing in the heads lasts even less.
Thanks, but I ended up going with the GHL Doser 2. It's sitting right here.
Since I already have the Profilux and the Doser 2 was available, the DOS made zero sense for me.
The GHL has four 24v stepper motors (dosing down to 0.1 ml) and more/better features for me.
And from owning other GHL products, I just can't deny how well made and how solid they are.
https://www.aquariumcomputer.com/products/ghl-doser/ghl-doser2/
For me, this was the best choice.
 

Reefahholic

Acropora Farmer
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,134
Reaction score
6,155
Location
Houston, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The Apex DOS is well made no doubt. However, it's only got two heads, big as a bus, too expensive, and loud!

GHL for me too. Solid customer service, great features, and solid build quality.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.5%
Back
Top