Here’s why opinions are flowing like cheap wine: they come come from behind a keyboard only, from assumptions never tested and all critics get to skip showing a better way to meet the demand outcome.
Impractical? How’d we get sixty pages of them for you to check for after pics? Some of these are 200 gallon setups
Where the work is, notice how opinions are so different in the thread compared to insulated and protected and never tested opinions @Ian_B:
You get the benefit of never having to be accountable for anyones outcome, while still being able to level what sounds like a well-positioned critique from work experience.
But the reality is, rip cleans still provide all those ends above nobody else will provide and you don’t have a better way we get to check for sixty pages of alternate work. If you do have that, post it
In that thread it’s all fixed tanks, happy reefers, complete confidence in outcomes made before the jobs begin for nine years
None of the diatribe you guys posted here is found there, where the work is
But here, where nobody has to provide work threads or test effort for any plan, and all examples are from our own tanks like you said: rip cleans are all bad with a litany of downsides and personal attacks in place. Keep up that dichotomy
You’re always going to feel slighted when asked to move beyond that lazy zone, at least before forming an opinion about someone else’s work. You have three hundred outcomes above to rework your opinion with above, and to complete that monumental task you’ll also need a working example of a better way with equally positive outcomes, good luck finding that. Link it here when you do.
From Ian B:
“To me Brandon seems to come across as sounding very superior through using his own jargon to post on”
This whole thread is about me asking others to create reference work (the kind we like, not a university article study link) and their fifteen reasons (other than Gregg) why they will not do that all while getting ribbed lightly for such armchair evals.
For you to invalidate the only sources of work examples we have so far for tank relocation work, tank invasion work, and cycling troubleshoots in six pages of discourse AND for you to opt out of creating your own while joining into groupthink pounce is quite the common mode. What Gregg did is the uncommon mode
Impractical? How’d we get sixty pages of them for you to check for after pics? Some of these are 200 gallon setups
Where the work is, notice how opinions are so different in the thread compared to insulated and protected and never tested opinions @Ian_B:
Official Sand Rinse and Tank Transfer thread
If you are reading this thread to cure a tank invasion from a link I sent you, we do not need to identify your type of invasion here we do not need you to test anything at anytime regarding nitrate, phosphate etc Above all, we do not need to see a microscope slide picture of your invasion at...
www.reef2reef.com
You get the benefit of never having to be accountable for anyones outcome, while still being able to level what sounds like a well-positioned critique from work experience.
But the reality is, rip cleans still provide all those ends above nobody else will provide and you don’t have a better way we get to check for sixty pages of alternate work. If you do have that, post it
In that thread it’s all fixed tanks, happy reefers, complete confidence in outcomes made before the jobs begin for nine years
None of the diatribe you guys posted here is found there, where the work is
But here, where nobody has to provide work threads or test effort for any plan, and all examples are from our own tanks like you said: rip cleans are all bad with a litany of downsides and personal attacks in place. Keep up that dichotomy
You’re always going to feel slighted when asked to move beyond that lazy zone, at least before forming an opinion about someone else’s work. You have three hundred outcomes above to rework your opinion with above, and to complete that monumental task you’ll also need a working example of a better way with equally positive outcomes, good luck finding that. Link it here when you do.
From Ian B:
“To me Brandon seems to come across as sounding very superior through using his own jargon to post on”
This whole thread is about me asking others to create reference work (the kind we like, not a university article study link) and their fifteen reasons (other than Gregg) why they will not do that all while getting ribbed lightly for such armchair evals.
For you to invalidate the only sources of work examples we have so far for tank relocation work, tank invasion work, and cycling troubleshoots in six pages of discourse AND for you to opt out of creating your own while joining into groupthink pounce is quite the common mode. What Gregg did is the uncommon mode
Last edited: