Imperial Stat Destroyer

ReefRookie22

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
120
Reaction score
176
Location
Bristol
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've only been in this hobby a short while but it's still taken me months to realise that a gallon is not the same in the UK and the US.
1 imperial gallon UK = 4.55 litres
1 US gallon = 3.79 litres
That's a 20% difference!
As so many of the R2R community are across the pond the advice is typically given in gallons. But I wonder how many people have fallen into the trap of getting the conversion wrong.
E.g. The recommended minimum tank size for a regal tang from this informative post by @revhtree is 180 gallons.
180 US gallons = 681 litres.
180 gallons UK imperial = 818 litres, a difference of 135 litres!!!
Similarly a 20 gallon nano tank could be 75 litres or 90 litres depending on the conversion.
I know volume is not the only consideration but it's often referred to as the most important one.
This will almost certainly have resulted in confusion from UK reefers and potentially hobbyists chasing far larger tanks than the US conversion would suggest.
This confusion could also extend to things like dosing of medications/additives or the compatibility/suitability of equipment.
I just thought it was worth pointing out in case this helps anyone else getting started out in the hobby from the UK.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,239
Reaction score
92,255
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
E.g. The recommended minimum tank size for a regal tang from this informative post by @revhtree is 180 gallons.
180 US gallons = 681 litres.
180 gallons UK imperial = 818 litres, a difference of 135 litres!!!

Yes, but American regal tangs are smaller, so it all works out. lol

As a general thing, all gallon measurements at Reef2Reef are in US gallons unless otherwise specified.

Of course, you didn't even start on cups as a unit of measure, which seems to stess out UK reefers all the time.
 

JayM

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 8, 2023
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
3,154
Location
Inland Empire
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not to mention the shape of the tank is more important than the unit of measure.

A tank that's 4' long by 2' wide by 2' deep is around 120 US gallons and would be completely appropriate for many larger sized fish. However, a tank that's 2' long by 2' wide by 4' deep would also be about 120 US gallons, but not at all appropriate for the same larger sized fish.
 

BeanAnimal

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
9,274
Reaction score
15,567
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Shall we discuss the volume of a pint of beer, say in the US, England, Australia -- etc.?
 

RockRash

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 20, 2024
Messages
1,064
Reaction score
4,941
Location
Norco CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, I read the title as " Imperial Star Destroyer " while I'm disappointed I didn't get to see some cool Star Wars fish. I did learn something new, so not a total loss. :beaming-face-with-smiling-eyes:
 

FUNGI

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
3,370
Reaction score
3,084
Location
COMPTON CALIFORNIA
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
1736990247728.png
 
OP
OP
ReefRookie22

ReefRookie22

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
120
Reaction score
176
Location
Bristol
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well, I read the title as " Imperial Star Destroyer " while I'm disappointed I didn't get to see some cool Star Wars fish. I did learn something new, so not a total loss. :beaming-face-with-smiling-eyes:
Reef safe with caution?
s-l1200.jpg
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 26.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.9%
Back
Top