Algae Scrubber or Macro Algae Reactor?

SCH14

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Messages
329
Reaction score
79
Location
Saint Louis
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Which one is more beneficial for a 310g tank with 6-8 large tangs and other reef safe fish+coral

Noticed when I added an 8" Unicorn tang my nitrates went from 5 to 25 within 3 days.

Currently only using a small amount of biopellets and tank has been running for 4.5 months.

If macro algae is more efficient Im thinking Ulva (sea lettuce)
 
Last edited:

Cabinetman

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
733
Reaction score
717
Location
Nova Scotia Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’ve got a 1200 gallon system with all 3 tanks plumbed into the same sump. I have the centre section that’s about 30x36 as a cheato grow with a 1000w equivalent plant grow light from Amazon that stays on 24/7. It’s fast and easy to maintain. I harvest about a bucket full every few weeks. Algae scrubbers are a pain to clean if you ask me. I’ve used one in the past plenty enough to know I like the cheato grow way better.
 

FishTruck

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 20, 2018
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
1,675
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I gave up on an algae scrubber, and just did a macro grow out tank. Same as above, cleaning out the scrubber every week for the meager amount of algae that came out wasn't worth it.

I just used two old radions and made something like 6500 k setting. The algae is growing fast enough to hold down my phosphates in a 1000 + system in the first month I set it up.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.5%
Back
Top