Alright, help me decide. INT or EXT

Would you rather own an INT or an EXT?


  • Total voters
    38

Kiiyo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
251
Reaction score
120
Location
California
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
One point I will say to be aware of regarding this. I bought a kessil with the arm mount for my tank that was basically pushed up against the wall, and I couldn't ever fully screw in and secure the arm to the bracket on the rim, so it's important to leave a little space.
1000024494.jpg
 

cobraz

Zoa Hunter
View Badges
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
857
Reaction score
397
Location
Florida
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I have the INM 50 Lagoon.
Great tank...but.
1st chamber Floss roller..also sticks out about 6" above tank.
2nd Media or Chaeto - its one or the other
Lg middle area pumps, probs, heaters, ato, doser lines..its crowded.
4th protein skimmer - limited what you can use.
5th chamber UV.

If I had to do it again..I would have sump.
Easy access, better options for equipment, space to clean, more media options, more water for stability, frag spot in sump, more area for chaeto..the list goes on. Way too many advantages. Cost is nearly the same for what you spend on reactors etc.

Also one last comment. The 50 Lagoon is 30" long.... if I had to do it again - I would go to a 48" long tank. That extra 18" goes pardon the pun a long way in building aquascape my sticks are jammed in...when they grow..its gonna be a harder time working in the tank.
 
Last edited:

Kiiyo

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2021
Messages
251
Reaction score
120
Location
California
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
I have the INM 50 Lagoon.
Great tank...but.
1st chamber Floss roller..also sticks out about 6" above tank.
2nd Media or Chaeto - its one or the other
Lg middle area pumps, probs, heaters, ato, doser lines..its crowded.
4th protein skimmer - limited what you can use.
5th chamber UV.

If I had to do it again..I would have sump.
Easy access, better options for equipment, space to clean, more media options, more water for stability, frag spot in sump, more area for chaeto..the list goes on. Way too many advantages. Cost is nearly the same for what you spend on reactors etc.

Also one last comment. The 50 Lagoon is 30" long.... if I had to do it again - I would go to a 48" long tank. That extra 18" goes pardon the pun a long way in building aquascape my sticks are jammed in...when they grow..its gonna be a harder time working in the tank.
I agree with the opinion to change to get a 4 foot tank if I was able to redo. Not only for the ability to allow coral to grow out more, but because your options for fish doesn't change much from say a 29G. Most common algae eating fish typically need at least 3ft. While the 6" between the 50 lagoon and a true 3ft tank isn't crazy, I try to avoid stocking fish that are borderline too big into smaller tanks.

Also I'd never do a tank again without a sump, complete game changer.
 

Sdbuehler1

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 31, 2021
Messages
411
Reaction score
607
Location
Berryville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think it really depends on the size of the tank. On tanks <= 48 inches , I would go EXT assuming you have enough room to place the tank a few extra inches off the wall to be able reach behind it. On tanks greater than 48 inches I would go with INT unless you have a utility room or access wall behind the tank. You will not be able to reach the plumbing if it ever requires maintenance.
 

Ryan - Serious Reefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2025
Messages
313
Reaction score
783
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Almost everyone starts with an internal overflow on their first tank or two, but many seasoned reefers eventually move to external overflows when they can. In my circle, the reasons are pretty consistent.

  • Flow is a big one. Advanced reefers tend to obsess over dialing in flow, getting it behind the rockwork, and creating real currents throughout the tank. With an internal overflow, that tower becomes a major obstruction and makes it much harder to fine tune circulation.
  • Depth is another factor. A tank may be marketed as 24 inches front to back, but once you place a 6 inch overflow box inside, the usable aquascaping space often feels closer to 18 inches. This is especially noticeable on tanks under 36 inches wide.
  • While most people like the idea of a tank sitting flush against the wall, many experienced reefers care more about what the tank looks like from the inside than from the outside.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.24.51 AM.png
    Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.24.51 AM.png
    226.7 KB · Views: 48
  • Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.25.26 AM.png
    Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.25.26 AM.png
    144 KB · Views: 46

Ryan - Serious Reefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2025
Messages
313
Reaction score
783
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is bigger than you originally planned, but I love these dimensions for an LPS or mixed reef tank. Transforms the animal behavior from pacing back and forth to a more natural 3D swim path. The added depth combined with the right scape makes for something really unique and fun.



Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.35.40 AM.png
 

X-37B

Fight The Good Fight
View Badges
Joined
Jul 3, 2017
Messages
14,073
Reaction score
23,041
Location
The Outer Limits
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is bigger than you originally planned, but I love these dimensions for an LPS or mixed reef tank. Transforms the animal behavior from pacing back and forth to a more natural 3D swim path. The added depth combined with the right scape makes for something really unique and fun.



Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.35.40 AM.png
I have both the ext, 50, ext 112, and an ext 170.
If the 112 fits your space go for it.
It's a great size and IM makes nice complete systems.
20260219_131659.jpg
 

Ryan - Serious Reefs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 3, 2025
Messages
313
Reaction score
783
Location
Minneapolis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I liked the old Red Sea Max tanks that had an interesting hybrid. A coast to coast external overflow that also sat flush with the wall. Kinda like a plumbed AIO.

I think they poofed because no one wanted all the "max gear" you had to buy with it. This was pre leak Armageddon...
Screenshot 2026-02-21 at 10.57.02 AM.png
 

cobraz

Zoa Hunter
View Badges
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
857
Reaction score
397
Location
Florida
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
One of the other most important things to remember as well... measure out the Height, Width and Length of were it is going to be on its stand by the documents and figure in space behind tank as well.

Last thing you want is a tank too high, that maintenance is a pain when your tank is up to your arm pit when you reach to the back of the tank from the center rock or not at some point if your hands are in the tank you don't want to be on a short ladder or tippy toes. I did a deep tank once regretted it every week when it came to maintenance of corals, etc. You will drop something or knock something over and don't want to struggle trying to reach it.
 

1ocean

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Messages
5,711
Reaction score
28,986
Location
Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
just had a 96x36x23 tank made with a internal over flow along the entire left panel of the tank.
will have three 1 1/2 inch over flow drain pipes and will allow me to have 3 chambers in the overflow box area. the middle one for the three drain pipes. the other two for felt and bio balls
the internal over flow box is 36x6x23
 

ryudo80

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 28, 2024
Messages
164
Reaction score
85
Location
Orlando
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I think it really depends on the size of the tank. On tanks <= 48 inches , I would go EXT assuming you have enough room to place the tank a few extra inches off the wall to be able reach behind it. On tanks greater than 48 inches I would go with INT unless you have a utility room or access wall behind the tank. You will not be able to reach the plumbing if it ever requires maintenance.
What about EXT for a longer tank that is offset to one corner instead of middle?
 

cobraz

Zoa Hunter
View Badges
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
857
Reaction score
397
Location
Florida
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
just had a 96x36x23 tank made with a internal over flow along the entire left panel of the tank.
will have three 1 1/2 inch over flow drain pipes and will allow me to have 3 chambers in the overflow box area. the middle one for the three drain pipes. the other two for felt and bio balls
the internal over flow box is 36x6x23
Don't use Bio Balls as in plastic. Use the new Bio Spere type media sort of like sporax but they don't leech unwanted chemical like the old Sporax did. BRS has them..they work great and allot of surface area without any chemicals entering the water, I have them in one of my chambers. The poly labs has rectangles but I think the round media is better for flow and surface area.
 

1ocean

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 18, 2020
Messages
5,711
Reaction score
28,986
Location
Arizona
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Don't use Bio Balls as in plastic. Use the new Bio Spere type media sort of like sporax but they don't leech unwanted chemical like the old Sporax did. BRS has them..they work great and allot of surface area without any chemicals entering the water, I have them in one of my chambers. The poly labs has rectangles but I think the round media is better for flow and surface area.
thanks for the intel... I will look into it. I have the old siporex in my sump but they are not going in the new sump
 

Luisn17

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 18, 2020
Messages
322
Reaction score
212
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The space from the wall to the tank should not be reason to pick one over the other. My tank is 4.5 inches from the wall with an internal overflow. I want to have room for pumps, lights, anything I may need to run. I found external to be noisier and in a tank of 7ft wide with no rear access, internal is the only way, if I have deal with a leak it will be a nightmare.

Some companies make big internal overflow which is a shame. I found waterbox to be a good compromise.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.9%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top