Small reef safe fish for 90g

GothFishKeeper

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
419
Reaction score
181
Location
Bolingbrook
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I’m toying with the idea of adding just one more fish to my 90g mixed reef as I’ve been having trouble keeping nutrients up. I thought about a blenny, but I’d be worried my giant bta would eat it. I looked into an orange spotted filefish but no way with the amount of softies and LPS I have.

Current fish are:
Pair of clowns
Pair of pygmy wasps
Dragon sleeper goby
Watanabe angel
White tail bristletooth tang

Another main concern I have is that my tang and my angel run the tank like they own it, and I’m afraid if anything remotely similar to them enter the tank they’d destroy it. I’m lucky they settled their own differences, they still square up to each other pretty offensively if I’m late to feed at all.

Any suggestions? This is the tank as of a week ago:
IMG_1770.jpeg
 

lapin

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
11,672
Reaction score
18,286
Location
Austin
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another main concern I have is that my tang and my angel run the tank like they own it, and I’m afraid if anything remotely similar to them enter the tank they’d destroy it.
There is your answer
 

vlangel

Seahorse whisperer
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
7,691
Reaction score
9,069
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think I would stay away from blennies as they are herbivores and the tang and angel might view it as competition. What about a hawkfish or even a Toby sharpnose puffer? Both of those like meaty food and as long as you don't have shrimp or small crabs/snails they probably would not be a problem. Your tank is big enough for both so you could do that to spread out aggression. I have a 75g and I also have a tang, angel and foxface but I am planning on adding either a scrawly cowfish or Toby puffer and a longnose hawkfish. I have macroalgae so I also want to keep my nutrients up.
 

Malum Argenteum

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 24, 2021
Messages
658
Reaction score
690
Location
Central WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are many ways to address low nutrients that don't involve risking fish.

 
OP
OP
GothFishKeeper

GothFishKeeper

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2024
Messages
419
Reaction score
181
Location
Bolingbrook
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There are many ways to address low nutrients that don't involve risking fish.

Thank you so much for this!! I’ll definitely give it a read once I’m out of work :)
 

Kasrift

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2022
Messages
16,591
Reaction score
29,526
Location
San Diego
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Maybe Springeri Damsel,
1763865940182.jpeg


Not the best picture…
Springer damsels are awesome, but kinda a small fish that won't add a ton to the nutrients.
I'd get a couple small fish though, you have the space. A Springeri, a pink streaked wrasse, and an assessor would work out.
 

Mrcote1

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
411
Reaction score
257
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

This is really nice for acclimating fish and you can use it as a trap if you need to. I just used it today to ensure nothing would fight a new full grown male pink square anthias i bought.

For the nutrients, you are not even close to over stocked in that tank
 

reefernc02

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 29, 2025
Messages
506
Reaction score
275
Location
Cherryville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think I would stay away from blennies as they are herbivores and the tang and angel might view it as competition. What about a hawkfish or even a Toby sharpnose puffer? Both of those like meaty food and as long as you don't have shrimp or small crabs/snails they probably would not be a problem. Your tank is big enough for both so you could do that to spread out aggression. I have a 75g and I also have a tang, angel and foxface but I am planning on adding either a scrawly cowfish or Toby puffer and a longnose hawkfish. I have macroalgae so I also want to keep my nutrients up.
Please do not go for the cow fish they are little nuclear boxes with poor survival rates
 

reefernc02

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 29, 2025
Messages
506
Reaction score
275
Location
Cherryville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If you don’t mind spending the money and want a last reef safe centerpiece fish get a Tahitian golden hawk I have one and he’s so yellow I feel like he glows 😂
 

vlangel

Seahorse whisperer
View Badges
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
7,691
Reaction score
9,069
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Please do not go for the cow fish they are little nuclear boxes with poor survival rates
The scrawly cowfish is not toxic. I would order it from KP Aquatics. They vouch that the scrawly are not toxic and they would not keep them in their system if they were. They are a vendor that I have been dealing with a long time and have found them to be excellent.
 

painter1982

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
878
Rating - 0%
0   1   0
A six line wrasse would work. I added mine last and it gets along with everyone. My yellow tang showed its dominance for about a week but now they all get along
 

Malum Argenteum

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 24, 2021
Messages
658
Reaction score
690
Location
Central WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A six line wrasse would work. I added mine last and it gets along with everyone. My yellow tang showed its dominance for about a week but now they all get along
Really, six weeks of apparent compatibility isn't sufficient to make a recommendation on something like this. After two or three years it would be an interesting single data point, though still not enough to say "would work" in light of very numerous contrary experiences.
 

painter1982

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
878
Rating - 0%
0   1   0
A six line wrasse would work. I added mine last and it gets along with everyone. My yellow tang showed its dominance for about a week but now they all get along
Really, six weeks of apparent compatibility isn't sufficient to make a recommendation on something like this. After two or three years it would be an interesting single data point, though still not enough to say "would work" in light of very numerous contrary experiences.
So wait two or three years between each addition of a fish? Seems like a long stretch
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.5%
Back
Top