Waterbox vs Cade

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Like the title states. I can’t decide between a waterbox box reef lx 330.7 or the Cade 2100 s2. I’m leaning more towards waterbox because I currently own a 175.6 frag. Just wanted someone input or opinions. I have time to decide not planning on ordering until end of summer. Started buying the equipment and rock already.

Waterbox 330.7 not too much cons from my exp other than I don’t like the stand doors. No dedicated electrical switch board or area just an open side in the cabinet and a panel. Cade has the nice electrical switches mounted and a dedicated portioned off space with a shelf. Cons I’ve come up with on the Cade system is you loose space in the display with how they do their overflow and ato reservoir placement.
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,349
Reaction score
20,861
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
They are of similar quality with Cade having better stands. I went with the Cade for the reason you listed as a con. I like the overflow outside of the display and the gravity fed ATO.
 
OP
OP
BlueGrass Reef

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
They are of similar quality with Cade having better stands. I went with the Cade for the reason you listed as a con. I like the overflow outside of the display and the gravity fed ATO.
I mean it’s not necessarily a bad thing with the ato and what not outside the tank like that but I like the 30” width of display in the 330.7. Never had a gravity fed ato…is the worry there the same with an ato pump runaway like if the float on the gravity fed doesn’t close it properly? I like the build quality of both. Love the stand for the Cade but like the waterbox tank.
 
Last edited:

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,349
Reaction score
20,861
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I mean it’s not necessarily a bad thing with the ato and what not outside the tank like that but I like the 30” width of display in the 330.7. Never had a gravity fed ato…is the worry there the same with an ato pump runaway like if the float on the gravity fed doesn’t close it properly? I like the build quality of both. Love the stand for the Cade but like the waterbox tank.
I actually am happy losing that space in the back just to have the overflow outside of the tank. The gravity fed overflow has less risks than a traditional pump ATO. The pump is much more likely to fail than the float.....plus the gravity fed system feeds water at a much slower rate if anything was to fail. You really can't go wrong with either to be honest.
 
OP
OP
BlueGrass Reef

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I actually am happy losing that space in the back just to have the overflow outside of the tank. The gravity fed overflow has less risks than a traditional pump ATO. The pump is much more likely to fail than the float.....plus the gravity fed system feeds water at a much slower rate if anything was to fail. You really can't go wrong with either to be honest.
Maybe all I really need is 24” width because I’m just doing bare bottom HNSA aquascaping. Because I do love the stand from Cade. Have you heard anything about bowing front glass on the 84” Cades where they aren’t braced? So that’s why I’m seeing more gravity fed systems with UNS and Cade
 

TastesLikeChicken

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 4, 2021
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
1,066
Location
Reno
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I prefer my Waterbox aquarium over CADE but prefer the CADE stand over the Waterbox.

If I were to buy a new one I would go Waterbox.
 
OP
OP
BlueGrass Reef

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I prefer my Waterbox aquarium over CADE but prefer the CADE stand over the Waterbox.

If I were to buy a new one I would go Waterbox.
I do love the stand on the Cade but where the Cade tank bows a little being a huge rimless kinda makes me nervous even though I haven’t heard anything bad about it. I love my current waterbox the stand is pretty meh and basic to me but overall no complaints really.

IMG_5374.jpeg
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,349
Reaction score
20,861
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Maybe all I really need is 24” width because I’m just doing bare bottom HNSA aquascaping. Because I do love the stand from Cade. Have you heard anything about bowing front glass on the 84” Cades where they aren’t braced? So that’s why I’m seeing more gravity fed systems with UNS and Cade
No, I have not heard anything about the Cades bowing. I couldn't imagine it just due to thickness of the glass and joints. I have a Cade 1800 with no issues, so far anyways. If I had anything to complain about it would be their plumbing.....only because they use metric sizes. Makes it hard to modify without ordering parts online.
 

Downfall

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
117
Reaction score
83
Location
WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
May I suggest going with a custom tank? In this size and price range you're bumping up against just getting something made exactly how you want it.

Friendly reminder that water box doesn't manufacturer anything. They subcontract all manufacturing out to companies in China. WB is also know for their bad customer service, on par or worse than red Sea...

Good luck with your decision
 
OP
OP
BlueGrass Reef

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No, I have not heard anything about the Cades bowing. I couldn't imagine it just due to thickness of the glass and joints. I have a Cade 1800 with no issues, so far anyways. If I had anything to complain about it would be their plumbing.....only because they use metric sizes. Makes it hard to modify without ordering parts online.
There’s a thread on here with someone who setup a cade 2100 and the front bows 3/8” and the custom acrylic lid barely stays on in the middle section because they didn’t account for the 3/8” bow in the center from water pressure. I have seen that the plumbing is metric I don’t really mess with plumbing unless I’m doing something completely custom but I’ll keep that in mind
 
OP
OP
BlueGrass Reef

BlueGrass Reef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
139
Reaction score
18
Location
Lexington, Ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
May I suggest going with a custom tank? In this size and price range you're bumping up against just getting something made exactly how you want it.

Friendly reminder that water box doesn't manufacturer anything. They subcontract all manufacturing out to companies in China. WB is also know for their bad customer service, on par or worse than red Sea...

Good luck with your decision
I’m exploring all options but leading is waterbox since I have a large one already and second is Cade. I don’t mind a nice custom tank but the thing for me is I just don’t like to do everything much anymore these days like building a stand, figuring out plumbing, making or getting a pre built sump that’s custom to the setup. Sometimes I feel like prices end up relatively close in the long run. But I have checked out some custom tank options
 

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
9,349
Reaction score
20,861
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
There’s a thread on here with someone who setup a cade 2100 and the front bows 3/8” and the custom acrylic lid barely stays on in the middle section because they didn’t account for the 3/8” bow in the center from water pressure. I have seen that the plumbing is metric I don’t really mess with plumbing unless I’m doing something completely custom but I’ll keep that in mind
Yeah I would be shocked if that is something that is happening consistently. No tank should be bowing like that. I know mine hasn't moved.....and that is with a wavebox lol.
 

lubeck

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Messages
2,411
Reaction score
2,905
Location
U.S.A
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I love my Cade 1800 peninsula . I don’t have experience with a WB. The 30” width is awesome, leaves plenty of room for grow out . Wouldn’t ever go shorter now.
 

apista

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 23, 2024
Messages
56
Reaction score
26
Location
Straya
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Neither in my opinion are worth your money, I have a Cade, it is a nice tank but the stand is very poorly designed, the state I received it in was disgusting. It came scuffed up, was filthy dirty, and they look very cheap thrown together rubbish.

I have never owned a Waterbox and they but the same, nice tanks but an even worse stand, I would not trust their stands in my house, especially the newer stands with 2020 box sections.

No thanks!!
 

feelingfishy

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 4, 2021
Messages
285
Reaction score
218
Location
Jasper
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The CADE 2100 does bow a bit, but I trust the overall build quality. If you can find a leak on a CADE DT please DM me.
I have searched diligently for such a post before and after my 2100 purchase and have yet to find one.
 

Cool tangs

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Messages
443
Reaction score
551
Location
Aus
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'll also back the quality of the cade, the stand, the sump, the glass and the silicone is thick! But it's also neat and ties in really well. Yes you lose space in a cade and it does challenge your thinking to make it all work, so plan ahead. But overall the systems are well thought out and I'm quite happy with my cade. But yes some days I do wish there was a little more cabinet space. Having the power bars is nice as well

1000005442.jpg
1000005444.jpg
1000005476.jpg
 

Jungle Blue

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 24, 2024
Messages
124
Reaction score
141
Location
NYC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When I filled up the 1500, my dad was very anxious about the weight and stand. He kept on hovering with the wrong kind of energy for days, so I kinda snapped and hung full body weight on the front Panel to show him that "I've done a lot of research and this is the strongest within the available tank companies". The stand didn't budge or creak at all. It's firm and sturdy. He stopped worrying after that :)

Plus, it started raining way more than expected during tank delivery. Gf and I had to abandon the lift midway into the yard. Put a garbage bag over the powerstrips and waited out. As the rain was coming down on the stand, all I could think was "good thing it's waterproof." After the rain cleared, moved it in and wiped it down. No swelling nothing. A stand with any wooden components would've been destroyed before I even put glass on top.

That was already a big-check moment for me and could not be more satisfied with my purchase. It's a well thought out product and very modular for different needs.
 

Liquid361

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
225
Reaction score
308
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a Cade 2100 S2. I love the tank! I have owned a large water box Peninsula that I also loved. The Cade tanks are next level as far as build quality goes. Mine has 3/4in glass and crazy seams. Not a chance it’ll ever bow. The sump is genius. The stand is amazing and will last forever. But there’s no wrong choice here.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.3%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 21.6%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.2%
Back
Top