Copper for preventative measures?

Diveks

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
266
Reaction score
108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been quarantining a pearlscale butterfly, bannerfish, and dartfish (in three different tanks). They are all eating well and i have treated them all with api general care. They are not showing any signs of ich, marine velvet, etc. im wondering if i will need to treat them with copper. In the past, all the fish that ive quarantined will usually go through copper treatment since ive lost hundreds or more from marine velvet. But is it even needed if they arent showing any signs?
 

HotRocks

Fish Fanatic!
View Badges
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
8,635
Reaction score
26,738
Location
Westfield, Indiana
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Personally I would treat them with copper yes, there are many people who observe and only treat if necessary. It really comes down to your own risk tolerance. If I were to observe only I would probably do so for a few months.

I just have too many fish in my tank that are "hard to keep" and the risk is not worth it to me. The thousands in livestock and all of the hard work maintaining a parasite free system just isn't worth the risk of not using prophylactic copper IMO.
 

LAReefer4Life

Lover of Angelfish
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
3,022
Reaction score
7,842
Location
LOS ANGELES CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Personally I would treat them with copper yes, there are many people who observe and only treat if necessary. It really comes down to your own risk tolerance. If I were to observe only I would probably do so for a few months.

I just have too many fish in my tank that are "hard to keep" and the risk is not worth it to me. The thousands in livestock and all of the hard work maintaining a parasite free system just isn't worth the risk of not using prophylactic copper IMO.

+1 all fish entering my system go through the same 4 step process. Article below

 
OP
OP
Diveks

Diveks

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
266
Reaction score
108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Personally I would treat them with copper yes, there are many people who observe and only treat if necessary. It really comes down to your own risk tolerance. If I were to observe only I would probably do so for a few months.

I just have too many fish in my tank that are "hard to keep" and the risk is not worth it to me. The thousands in livestock and all of the hard work maintaining a parasite free system just isn't worth the risk of not using prophylactic copper IMO.
Ok thanks, i will continue treating them with copper just in case. Im not risking it again after what happened.
 

Crabs McJones

Regional Reef Manager (AKA Revhtree's Boss)
View Badges
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Messages
33,584
Reaction score
153,813
Location
Wisconsin
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
Personally I would treat them with copper yes, there are many people who observe and only treat if necessary. It really comes down to your own risk tolerance. If I were to observe only I would probably do so for a few months.

I just have too many fish in my tank that are "hard to keep" and the risk is not worth it to me. The thousands in livestock and all of the hard work maintaining a parasite free system just isn't worth the risk of not using prophylactic copper IMO.
This %110
If you can completely avoid the risk and hassle of catching and treating later, why not put the extra effort in now :)
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%

New Posts

Back
Top