I'd say to a point, paying more gets a better product. While that light is likely good enough for a 10g nano you use it for, its really quite weak. 100 LEDs but 25w means very weak LEDs. Look at the ones the higher end lights use, 3-5W per LED. Compare that to something like: https://reefbreeders.com/shop/photon-16-v2/ less than half the lights, puts out way more PAR.
Wattage doesn't always translate into quality output. It greatly depends on the type of diode used and how the lens is shaped and positioned. They aren't necessarily "weak." Fluval is a good example. Specs on the Sea 3.0 Nano show impressive PAR and LUX measurements and proper spectrum but only meager 850 lumen. In my experience working with LED products, higher wattage translated into higher lumen output, which doesn't mean much in a reef lighting. How efficient the light is at producing results is what matters.
Our Volvo SUV has a four-cylinder engine. One would assume it's "weak" when compared to a six-cylinder power plant. However, the Volvo has a super turbo and puts out over 300 HP and about as much torque, enough to bring this thing up to 60/Mph in 6 seconds or thereabout.