HANNAH-API-RED SEA weird results!!

jordimex

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So today a couple friends came to my house and are really knowledgeable about both marine and fresh water tanks, they are from argentina and brazil they came to the house for a beer and to talk about corals and fish,
one of the guys told me that he wanted to test my water so i handed him all my test kits
he did 3 red sea calcium tests and got a result saying my calcium was under 290
i did 1 api test and got a result of 380
i did 2 test with my Hannah checker and got 1 result of 511 and another one for 490
he did the test down to a T same as me how are this results posible!! and which one should i trust
tomorrow ill be getting a salifert test to see what it says

any advice?
 

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,191
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Average them out and you're set.

Reagents do go bad or come bad. Happens with all kits. The red sea is either bad or not done right. I found API kit to be reliable and accurate enough. I don't have any experience with thr hanna but others seem to have had troubles with that one.
 

Martin Kuhn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
229
Reaction score
108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Average them out and you're set.

I don't agree. Results are strongly different.

Without having measured a sample with EXACTLY KNOWN Ca concentration, you can't which test kits measures correct or how far it is off.

I suggest to buy a Ca-reference or, better, a salt water multi reference and measure with all test kits. Then you know.
 

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,191
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It was sarcasm as the next statement was in belief that the redsea reading is inaccurate. Otherwise I would have no issue with averaging the API and hanna numbers. Both strike an acceptable range.
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol!!!

I'd trust the API over the hanna cal for a ball part #. :D
Got in my first bad refill on the Red Red Pro cal ever, at the first of the year. :(
 

Tautog

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
1,614
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Interesting, but did you test for KH???
Ca tests do vary during the day because of consumption
 
OP
OP
jordimex

jordimex

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lol!!!

I'd trust the API over the hanna cal for a ball part #. :D
Got in my first bad refill on the Red Red Pro cal ever, at the first of the year. :(
i am thinking i have a bad red sea reagent or something it was the first time buying that product don't think i will ever do it again
 
OP
OP
jordimex

jordimex

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
457
Reaction score
152
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't agree. Results are strongly different.

Without having measured a sample with EXACTLY KNOWN Ca concentration, you can't which test kits measures correct or how far it is off.

I suggest to buy a Ca-reference or, better, a salt water multi reference and measure with all test kits. Then you know.
i will try to get salt water multi reference to see make sure
 

Martin Kuhn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
229
Reaction score
108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Again.... without having a proof by a trusted sample that is measured, all assumptions which test kit might be the most accurate is nonsense in my eyes
 

jason2459

Not a paid scientist
View Badges
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4,668
Reaction score
3,191
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
A good reference solution can be handy and can be made. But luckily the margin of an acceptable value for our tanks is rather large.
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
i am thinking i have a bad red sea reagent or something it was the first time buying that product don't think i will ever do it again
Could be :(
Been using the Salifert over here. :)
 

Martin Kuhn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
229
Reaction score
108
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm not randy
But
Another reason might be that you didn't act fully as the testing method including reading the measurement results, was intended

... all test kits work a but differently
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,311
Reaction score
63,657
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
hey @Randy Holmes-Farley could there be another explanation apart from the test reagents gone bad?

User error. :D

I've done lots of tests, leaving out a step. Some people read syringes backwards or incorrectly, misremember volumes to use, cross contaminate equipment, etc. All sorts of things.

The 290 ppm sounds off, regardless of the method. It is very rare for a reef tank to get that low.
 

Tautog

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
1,614
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Alkalinity???
It's a test that is really the most important, and should be done more often that most. If you want stability chase Alkalinity, then Ca and Mg in that order. All 3 work together
 

High pressure shells: Do you look for signs of stress in the invertebrates in your reef tank?

  • I regularly look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 27 35.1%
  • I occasionally look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • I rarely look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 12 15.6%
  • I never look for signs of invertebrate stress in my reef tank.

    Votes: 19 24.7%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top